Conversion of standardized ReadMe file for
file /./ftp/cats/J/ApJ/792/76 into FORTRAN code for reading data files line by line.
Note that special values are assigned to unknown or unspecified
numbers (also called NULL numbers);
when necessary, the coordinate components making up the right ascension
and declination are converted into floating-point numbers
representing these angles in degrees.
program load_ReadMe
C=============================================================================
C F77-compliant program generated by readme2f_1.81 (2015-09-23), on 2024-Apr-19
C=============================================================================
* This code was generated from the ReadMe file documenting a catalogue
* according to the "Standard for Documentation of Astronomical Catalogues"
* currently in use by the Astronomical Data Centers (CDS, ADC, A&A)
* (see full documentation at URL http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/doc/catstd.htx)
* Please report problems or questions to
C=============================================================================
implicit none
* Unspecified or NULL values, generally corresponding to blank columns,
* are assigned one of the following special values:
* rNULL__ for unknown or NULL floating-point values
* iNULL__ for unknown or NULL integer values
real*4 rNULL__
integer*4 iNULL__
parameter (rNULL__=--2147483648.) ! NULL real number
parameter (iNULL__=(-2147483647-1)) ! NULL int number
integer idig ! testing NULL number
C=============================================================================
Cat. J/ApJ/792/76 Lensed z~6-8 galaxies behind CLASH clusters (Bradley+, 2014)
*================================================================================
*CLASH: a census of magnified star-forming galaxies at z ~ 6-8.
* Bradley L.D., Zitrin A., Coe D., Bouwens R., Postman M., Balestra I.,
* Grillo C., Monna A., Rosati P., Seitz S., Host O., Lemze D., Moustakas J.,
* Moustakas L.A., Shu X., Zheng W., Broadhurst T., Carrasco M., Jouvel S.,
* Koekemoer A., Medezinski E., Meneghetti M., Nonino M., Smit R., Umetsu K.,
* Bartelmann M., Benitez N., Donahue M., Ford H., Infante L.,
* Jimenez-Teja Y., Kelson D., Lahav O., Maoz D., Melchior P., Merten J.,
* Molino A.
* <Astrophys. J., 792, 76 (2014)>
* =2014ApJ...792...76B (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
C=============================================================================
C Internal variables
integer*4 i__
c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C Declarations for 'table1.dat' ! Observational Details for the Cluster Sample
integer*4 nr__
parameter (nr__=18) ! Number of records
character*93 ar__ ! Full-size record
C J2000 position composed of: RAh RAm RAs DE- DEd DEm DEs
real*8 RAdeg ! (deg) Right Ascension J2000
real*8 DEdeg ! (deg) Declination J2000
C ---------------------------------- ! (position vector(s) in degrees)
character*16 Cluster ! Cluster Name
character*5 n_Cluster ! Notes on Cluster (1)
character*8 Alias ! Shortened cluster names used in the paper
integer*4 RAh ! (h) Rigth ascension (J2000) (2)
integer*4 RAm ! (min) Rigth ascension (J2000) (2)
real*4 RAs ! (s) Rigth ascension (J2000) (2)
character*1 n_RAs ! [g] Note on position (3)
character*1 DE_ ! Declination sign (J2000) (2)
integer*4 DEd ! (deg) Declination (J2000) (2)
integer*4 DEm ! (arcmin) Declination (J2000) (2)
real*4 DEs ! (arcsec) Declination (J2000) (2)
character*1 n_DEs ! [g] Note on position (3)
real*4 z ! Cluster redshift
real*4 E_B_V ! (mag) Reddening
character*11 Start_Date ! ("date") Observation starting date
character*11 End_Date ! ("date") Observation ending date
*Note (1): Notes as follows:
* c = Ebeling et al. (2007ApJ...661L..33E)
* d = High-magnification cluster
* e = Hubble Frontier Fields (HFF) cluster
* f = Ebeling et al. (2010MNRAS.407...83E)
* h = Mann & Ebeling (2012MNRAS.420.2120M)
*Note (2): Cluster coordinates derived from X-ray data, except where noted.
*Note (3): g when cluster coordinates derived from optical data.
c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C Declarations for 'table4.dat' ! Lensed z~6 Candidates Identified Behind
17 CLASH Clusters
integer*4 nr__1
parameter (nr__1=196) ! Number of records
character*133 ar__1 ! Full-size record
C J2000 position composed of: RAdeg DEdeg
character*13 ID ! Object identifier (1)
character*5 f_ID ! Flag on ID (2)
real*8 RAdeg_1 ! (deg) Right Ascension in decimal degrees (J2000)
real*8 DEdeg_1 ! (deg) Declination in decimal degrees (J2000)
character*1 l_I814mag ! Limit flag on I814mag
real*4 I814mag ! (mag) The HST I band AB magnitude; 0.814 microns
real*4 e_I814mag ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in I814mag
character*1 l_z850mag ! Limit flag on z850mag
real*4 z850mag ! (mag) The HST z band AB magnitude; 0.850 microns
real*4 e_z850mag ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in z850mag
real*4 Y105mag ! (mag) ? The HST Y band AB magnitude; 1.05 microns
real*4 e_Y105mag ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in Y105mag
real*4 Y110mag ! (mag) ? The HST Y band AB magnitude; 1.10 microns
real*4 e_Y110mag ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in Y110mag
real*4 J125mag ! (mag) ? The HST J band AB magnitude 1.25 microns
real*4 e_J125mag ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in J125mag
real*4 J140mag ! (mag) ? The HST J band AB magnitude; 1.40 microns
real*4 e_J140mag ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in J140mag
real*4 H160mag ! (mag) The HST H band AB magnitude; 1.60 microns
real*4 e_H160mag ! (mag) Uncertainty in H160mag
real*4 zphot ! Photometric redshift (3)
real*4 E_zphot ! Upper limit uncertainty in zphot
real*4 e_zphot_1 ! Lower limit uncertainty in zphot
character*1 l_mu ! Limit flag on mu
real*4 mu ! Magnification (4)
*Note (1): Object identified as Alias-NNNN.
*Note (2): Flag as follows:
* c = Unresolved object with FWHM<0.22 arcsec in the image plane. There is
* a small chance that brighter unresolved candidates could be low-mass
* stars even though we explored such possibilities (see Section 5.3).
* d = Using LePhare, we find that these unresolved candidates have a good fit
* with stellar templates, with {chi}^2^_star_ comparable or less than
* {chi}^2^_galaxy_.
* e = While BPZ prefers a high-redshift solution, we note that LePhare
* slightly prefers a low-redshift solution (z~1) over the high-redshift
* solution for these three galaxies. Given this and the possible fit
* with stellar templates, these candidates should be considered less
* confident than the others.
* f = Spectroscopically confirmed multiply-imaged galaxy at z=6.027
* Richard et al. (2011MNRAS.414L..31R).
* g = Quadruply lensed galaxy at z~6.2 (Zitrin et al. 2012ApJ...747L...9Z).
* h = Zitrin et al. (2013ApJ...762L..30Z) report that MACS0419-0419 is part of
* a visually-identified double system at z_phot_~6.1. The second
* candidate (at RA=04:16:09.946, DE=-24:03:45.31) fell below
* our S/N threshold and thus does not appear in this catalog.
* i = MACS1115-0352 and MACS1720-1114 have very blue SEDs. While our
* best-fit photometric redshifts suggest that these are high-redshift
* candidates, a possible alternative solution is that they could be
* low-redshift extreme emission-line galaxies with rest-frame equivalent
* widths of ~2000 Angstroms (Huang et al. in prep).
* j = Quadruply lensed galaxy at z_phot_~5.6 (z_spec_=5.701)
* (Zitrin et al. 2012, J/ApJ/749/97).
* k = VLT/VIMOS spectroscopy confirms this galaxy at z=5.701 (see Section 5).
* l = Monna et al. (2014MNRAS.438.1417M) found that these two candidates,
* along with three others, are part of a quintuply-lensed system with
* z_phot_~5.9. Based on their lens model, the magnifications for
* RXCJ2248-0401 and RXCJ2248-1291 (ID4 and ID3, respectively in
* Monna et al. (2014MNRAS.438.1417M) are 2.4 {+/-} 0.2 and 6.0 {+/-} 1.5,
* respectively.
* m = In the recent Hubble Frontier Fields data, this candiate is detected in
* the ultradeep optical data and therefore it is very unlikely to be a
* high-redshift galaxy.
* n = MACS0717-0859 and MACS0717-1730 are spectroscopically confirmed at
* z=6.387 (Vanzella et al. 2014ApJ...783L..12V).
* o = Despite having a best-fit photometric redshift of zphot = 7.2, we suspect
* this unresolved object is most likely a star. Based on our current
* understanding of the z~7 LF (e.g., Bouwens et al. 2011ApJ...737...90B),
* the probability of detecting a slightly-magnified z~7 galaxy with
* H160=23.6 in the small area covered by the clusters in this paper is
* exceedingly small. We list this candidate for completeness, but do not
* use it for subsequent analysis given its suspect nature.
* p = The lens models suggest that this is likely a multiple system at z~6.5.
* q = The lens models suggest that this is likely a multiple system at z~6.6.
* r = In the recent Hubble Frontier Fields data, this candidate is detected in
* the ultradeep optical data and therefore it is very unlikely to be a
* high-redshift galaxy.
*Note (3): Photometric redshift estimate with 2{sigma} (95%) confidence
* intervals (see Section 4). Objects with large lower bounds have a secondary
* peak at lower redshift (z~1-2) that contains at least 5% of the posterior
* probabilty.
*Note (4): Magnification estimate from the lens models (see Section 6). Because
* of uncertainties in the precise location of the critical curves, objects with
* magnifications >100 are simply quoted as such. Objects outside the region
* constrained by the strong lensing models have been assigned a magnification
* of 1.1.
c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C Declarations for 'table5.dat' ! Lensed z~7 Candidates Identified Behind
17 CLASH Clusters
integer*4 nr__2
parameter (nr__2=43) ! Number of records
character*133 ar__2 ! Full-size record
C J2000 position composed of: RAdeg DEdeg
character*13 ID_1 ! Object identifier (1)
character*5 f_ID_1 ! Flag on ID (2)
real*8 RAdeg_2 ! (deg) Right Ascension in decimal degrees (J2000)
real*8 DEdeg_2 ! (deg) Declination in decimal degrees (J2000)
character*1 l_I814mag_1 ! Limit flag on I814mag
real*4 I814mag_1 ! (mag) The HST I band AB magnitude; 0.814 microns
real*4 e_I814mag_1 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in I814mag
character*1 l_z850mag_1 ! Limit flag on z850mag
real*4 z850mag_1 ! (mag) The HST z band AB magnitude; 0.850 microns
real*4 e_z850mag_1 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in z850mag
real*4 Y105mag_1 ! (mag) ? The HST Y band AB magnitude; 1.05 microns
real*4 e_Y105mag_1 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in Y105mag
real*4 Y110mag_1 ! (mag) ? The HST Y band AB magnitude; 1.10 microns
real*4 e_Y110mag_1 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in Y110mag
real*4 J125mag_1 ! (mag) ? The HST J band AB magnitude 1.25 microns
real*4 e_J125mag_1 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in J125mag
real*4 J140mag_1 ! (mag) ? The HST J band AB magnitude; 1.40 microns
real*4 e_J140mag_1 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in J140mag
real*4 H160mag_1 ! (mag) The HST H band AB magnitude; 1.60 microns
real*4 e_H160mag_1 ! (mag) Uncertainty in H160mag
real*4 zphot_1 ! Photometric redshift (3)
real*4 E_zphot_2 ! Upper limit uncertainty in zphot
real*4 e_zphot_3 ! Lower limit uncertainty in zphot
character*1 l_mu_1 ! Limit flag on mu
real*4 mu_1 ! Magnification (4)
*Note (1): Object identified as Alias-NNNN.
*Note (2): Flag as follows:
* c = Unresolved object with FWHM<0.22 arcsec in the image plane. There is
* a small chance that brighter unresolved candidates could be low-mass
* stars even though we explored such possibilities (see Section 5.3).
* d = Using LePhare, we find that these unresolved candidates have a good fit
* with stellar templates, with {chi}^2^_star_ comparable or less than
* {chi}^2^_galaxy_.
* e = While BPZ prefers a high-redshift solution, we note that LePhare
* slightly prefers a low-redshift solution (z~1) over the high-redshift
* solution for these three galaxies. Given this and the possible fit
* with stellar templates, these candidates should be considered less
* confident than the others.
* f = Spectroscopically confirmed multiply-imaged galaxy at z=6.027
* Richard et al. (2011MNRAS.414L..31R).
* g = Quadruply lensed galaxy at z~6.2 (Zitrin et al. 2012ApJ...747L...9Z).
* h = Zitrin et al. (2013ApJ...762L..30Z) report that MACS0419-0419 is part of
* a visually-identified double system at z_phot_~6.1. The second
* candidate (at RA=04:16:09.946, DE=-24:03:45.31) fell below
* our S/N threshold and thus does not appear in this catalog.
* i = MACS1115-0352 and MACS1720-1114 have very blue SEDs. While our
* best-fit photometric redshifts suggest that these are high-redshift
* candidates, a possible alternative solution is that they could be
* low-redshift extreme emission-line galaxies with rest-frame equivalent
* widths of ~2000 Angstroms (Huang et al. in prep).
* j = Quadruply lensed galaxy at z_phot_~5.6 (z_spec_=5.701)
* (Zitrin et al. 2012, J/ApJ/749/97).
* k = VLT/VIMOS spectroscopy confirms this galaxy at z=5.701 (see Section 5).
* l = Monna et al. (2014MNRAS.438.1417M) found that these two candidates,
* along with three others, are part of a quintuply-lensed system with
* z_phot_~5.9. Based on their lens model, the magnifications for
* RXCJ2248-0401 and RXCJ2248-1291 (ID4 and ID3, respectively in
* Monna et al. (2014MNRAS.438.1417M) are 2.4 {+/-} 0.2 and 6.0 {+/-} 1.5,
* respectively.
* m = In the recent Hubble Frontier Fields data, this candiate is detected in
* the ultradeep optical data and therefore it is very unlikely to be a
* high-redshift galaxy.
* n = MACS0717-0859 and MACS0717-1730 are spectroscopically confirmed at
* z=6.387 (Vanzella et al. 2014ApJ...783L..12V).
* o = Despite having a best-fit photometric redshift of zphot = 7.2, we suspect
* this unresolved object is most likely a star. Based on our current
* understanding of the z~7 LF (e.g., Bouwens et al. 2011ApJ...737...90B),
* the probability of detecting a slightly-magnified z~7 galaxy with
* H160=23.6 in the small area covered by the clusters in this paper is
* exceedingly small. We list this candidate for completeness, but do not
* use it for subsequent analysis given its suspect nature.
* p = The lens models suggest that this is likely a multiple system at z~6.5.
* q = The lens models suggest that this is likely a multiple system at z~6.6.
* r = In the recent Hubble Frontier Fields data, this candidate is detected in
* the ultradeep optical data and therefore it is very unlikely to be a
* high-redshift galaxy.
*Note (3): Photometric redshift estimate with 2{sigma} (95%) confidence
* intervals (see Section 4). Objects with large lower bounds have a secondary
* peak at lower redshift (z~1-2) that contains at least 5% of the posterior
* probabilty.
*Note (4): Magnification estimate from the lens models (see Section 6). Because
* of uncertainties in the precise location of the critical curves, objects with
* magnifications >100 are simply quoted as such. Objects outside the region
* constrained by the strong lensing models have been assigned a magnification
* of 1.1.
c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C Declarations for 'table6.dat' ! Lensed z~8 Candidates Identified Behind
17 CLASH Clusters
integer*4 nr__3
parameter (nr__3=12) ! Number of records
character*133 ar__3 ! Full-size record
C J2000 position composed of: RAdeg DEdeg
character*13 ID_2 ! Object identifier (1)
character*5 f_ID_2 ! Flag on ID (2)
real*8 RAdeg_3 ! (deg) Right Ascension in decimal degrees (J2000)
real*8 DEdeg_3 ! (deg) Declination in decimal degrees (J2000)
character*1 l_I814mag_2 ! Limit flag on I814mag
real*4 I814mag_2 ! (mag) The HST I band AB magnitude; 0.814 microns
real*4 e_I814mag_2 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in I814mag
character*1 l_z850mag_2 ! Limit flag on z850mag
real*4 z850mag_2 ! (mag) The HST z band AB magnitude; 0.850 microns
real*4 e_z850mag_2 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in z850mag
real*4 Y105mag_2 ! (mag) ? The HST Y band AB magnitude; 1.05 microns
real*4 e_Y105mag_2 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in Y105mag
real*4 Y110mag_2 ! (mag) ? The HST Y band AB magnitude; 1.10 microns
real*4 e_Y110mag_2 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in Y110mag
real*4 J125mag_2 ! (mag) ? The HST J band AB magnitude 1.25 microns
real*4 e_J125mag_2 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in J125mag
real*4 J140mag_2 ! (mag) ? The HST J band AB magnitude; 1.40 microns
real*4 e_J140mag_2 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in J140mag
real*4 H160mag_2 ! (mag) The HST H band AB magnitude; 1.60 microns
real*4 e_H160mag_2 ! (mag) Uncertainty in H160mag
real*4 zphot_2 ! Photometric redshift (3)
real*4 E_zphot_4 ! Upper limit uncertainty in zphot
real*4 e_zphot_5 ! Lower limit uncertainty in zphot
character*1 l_mu_2 ! Limit flag on mu
real*4 mu_2 ! Magnification (4)
*Note (1): Object identified as Alias-NNNN.
*Note (2): Flag as follows:
* c = Unresolved object with FWHM<0.22 arcsec in the image plane. There is
* a small chance that brighter unresolved candidates could be low-mass
* stars even though we explored such possibilities (see Section 5.3).
* d = Using LePhare, we find that these unresolved candidates have a good fit
* with stellar templates, with {chi}^2^_star_ comparable or less than
* {chi}^2^_galaxy_.
* e = While BPZ prefers a high-redshift solution, we note that LePhare
* slightly prefers a low-redshift solution (z~1) over the high-redshift
* solution for these three galaxies. Given this and the possible fit
* with stellar templates, these candidates should be considered less
* confident than the others.
* f = Spectroscopically confirmed multiply-imaged galaxy at z=6.027
* Richard et al. (2011MNRAS.414L..31R).
* g = Quadruply lensed galaxy at z~6.2 (Zitrin et al. 2012ApJ...747L...9Z).
* h = Zitrin et al. (2013ApJ...762L..30Z) report that MACS0419-0419 is part of
* a visually-identified double system at z_phot_~6.1. The second
* candidate (at RA=04:16:09.946, DE=-24:03:45.31) fell below
* our S/N threshold and thus does not appear in this catalog.
* i = MACS1115-0352 and MACS1720-1114 have very blue SEDs. While our
* best-fit photometric redshifts suggest that these are high-redshift
* candidates, a possible alternative solution is that they could be
* low-redshift extreme emission-line galaxies with rest-frame equivalent
* widths of ~2000 Angstroms (Huang et al. in prep).
* j = Quadruply lensed galaxy at z_phot_~5.6 (z_spec_=5.701)
* (Zitrin et al. 2012, J/ApJ/749/97).
* k = VLT/VIMOS spectroscopy confirms this galaxy at z=5.701 (see Section 5).
* l = Monna et al. (2014MNRAS.438.1417M) found that these two candidates,
* along with three others, are part of a quintuply-lensed system with
* z_phot_~5.9. Based on their lens model, the magnifications for
* RXCJ2248-0401 and RXCJ2248-1291 (ID4 and ID3, respectively in
* Monna et al. (2014MNRAS.438.1417M) are 2.4 {+/-} 0.2 and 6.0 {+/-} 1.5,
* respectively.
* m = In the recent Hubble Frontier Fields data, this candiate is detected in
* the ultradeep optical data and therefore it is very unlikely to be a
* high-redshift galaxy.
* n = MACS0717-0859 and MACS0717-1730 are spectroscopically confirmed at
* z=6.387 (Vanzella et al. 2014ApJ...783L..12V).
* o = Despite having a best-fit photometric redshift of zphot = 7.2, we suspect
* this unresolved object is most likely a star. Based on our current
* understanding of the z~7 LF (e.g., Bouwens et al. 2011ApJ...737...90B),
* the probability of detecting a slightly-magnified z~7 galaxy with
* H160=23.6 in the small area covered by the clusters in this paper is
* exceedingly small. We list this candidate for completeness, but do not
* use it for subsequent analysis given its suspect nature.
* p = The lens models suggest that this is likely a multiple system at z~6.5.
* q = The lens models suggest that this is likely a multiple system at z~6.6.
* r = In the recent Hubble Frontier Fields data, this candidate is detected in
* the ultradeep optical data and therefore it is very unlikely to be a
* high-redshift galaxy.
*Note (3): Photometric redshift estimate with 2{sigma} (95%) confidence
* intervals (see Section 4). Objects with large lower bounds have a secondary
* peak at lower redshift (z~1-2) that contains at least 5% of the posterior
* probabilty.
*Note (4): Magnification estimate from the lens models (see Section 6). Because
* of uncertainties in the precise location of the critical curves, objects with
* magnifications >100 are simply quoted as such. Objects outside the region
* constrained by the strong lensing models have been assigned a magnification
* of 1.1.
c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C Declarations for 'table7.dat' ! Lensed Candidates Identified Behind
RXJ1532.9+3021
integer*4 nr__4
parameter (nr__4=21) ! Number of records
character*133 ar__4 ! Full-size record
C J2000 position composed of: RAdeg DEdeg
character*13 ID_3 ! Object identifier (1)
character*5 f_ID_3 ! Flag on ID (2)
real*8 RAdeg_4 ! (deg) Right Ascension in decimal degrees (J2000)
real*8 DEdeg_4 ! (deg) Declination in decimal degrees (J2000)
character*1 l_I814mag_3 ! Limit flag on I814mag
real*4 I814mag_3 ! (mag) The HST I band AB magnitude; 0.814 microns
real*4 e_I814mag_3 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in I814mag
character*1 l_z850mag_3 ! Limit flag on z850mag
real*4 z850mag_3 ! (mag) The HST z band AB magnitude; 0.850 microns
real*4 e_z850mag_3 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in z850mag
real*4 Y105mag_3 ! (mag) ? The HST Y band AB magnitude; 1.05 microns
real*4 e_Y105mag_3 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in Y105mag
real*4 Y110mag_3 ! (mag) ? The HST Y band AB magnitude; 1.10 microns
real*4 e_Y110mag_3 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in Y110mag
real*4 J125mag_3 ! (mag) ? The HST J band AB magnitude 1.25 microns
real*4 e_J125mag_3 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in J125mag
real*4 J140mag_3 ! (mag) ? The HST J band AB magnitude; 1.40 microns
real*4 e_J140mag_3 ! (mag) ? Uncertainty in J140mag
real*4 H160mag_3 ! (mag) The HST H band AB magnitude; 1.60 microns
real*4 e_H160mag_3 ! (mag) Uncertainty in H160mag
real*4 zphot_3 ! Photometric redshift (3)
real*4 E_zphot_6 ! Upper limit uncertainty in zphot
real*4 e_zphot_7 ! Lower limit uncertainty in zphot
character*1 l_mu_3 ! Limit flag on mu
real*4 mu_3 ! Magnification (4)
*Note (1): Object identified as Alias-NNNN.
*Note (2): Flag as follows:
* c = Unresolved object with FWHM<0.22 arcsec in the image plane. There is
* a small chance that brighter unresolved candidates could be low-mass
* stars even though we explored such possibilities (see Section 5.3).
* d = Using LePhare, we find that these unresolved candidates have a good fit
* with stellar templates, with {chi}^2^_star_ comparable or less than
* {chi}^2^_galaxy_.
* e = While BPZ prefers a high-redshift solution, we note that LePhare
* slightly prefers a low-redshift solution (z~1) over the high-redshift
* solution for these three galaxies. Given this and the possible fit
* with stellar templates, these candidates should be considered less
* confident than the others.
* f = Spectroscopically confirmed multiply-imaged galaxy at z=6.027
* Richard et al. (2011MNRAS.414L..31R).
* g = Quadruply lensed galaxy at z~6.2 (Zitrin et al. 2012ApJ...747L...9Z).
* h = Zitrin et al. (2013ApJ...762L..30Z) report that MACS0419-0419 is part of
* a visually-identified double system at z_phot_~6.1. The second
* candidate (at RA=04:16:09.946, DE=-24:03:45.31) fell below
* our S/N threshold and thus does not appear in this catalog.
* i = MACS1115-0352 and MACS1720-1114 have very blue SEDs. While our
* best-fit photometric redshifts suggest that these are high-redshift
* candidates, a possible alternative solution is that they could be
* low-redshift extreme emission-line galaxies with rest-frame equivalent
* widths of ~2000 Angstroms (Huang et al. in prep).
* j = Quadruply lensed galaxy at z_phot_~5.6 (z_spec_=5.701)
* (Zitrin et al. 2012, J/ApJ/749/97).
* k = VLT/VIMOS spectroscopy confirms this galaxy at z=5.701 (see Section 5).
* l = Monna et al. (2014MNRAS.438.1417M) found that these two candidates,
* along with three others, are part of a quintuply-lensed system with
* z_phot_~5.9. Based on their lens model, the magnifications for
* RXCJ2248-0401 and RXCJ2248-1291 (ID4 and ID3, respectively in
* Monna et al. (2014MNRAS.438.1417M) are 2.4 {+/-} 0.2 and 6.0 {+/-} 1.5,
* respectively.
* m = In the recent Hubble Frontier Fields data, this candiate is detected in
* the ultradeep optical data and therefore it is very unlikely to be a
* high-redshift galaxy.
* n = MACS0717-0859 and MACS0717-1730 are spectroscopically confirmed at
* z=6.387 (Vanzella et al. 2014ApJ...783L..12V).
* o = Despite having a best-fit photometric redshift of zphot = 7.2, we suspect
* this unresolved object is most likely a star. Based on our current
* understanding of the z~7 LF (e.g., Bouwens et al. 2011ApJ...737...90B),
* the probability of detecting a slightly-magnified z~7 galaxy with
* H160=23.6 in the small area covered by the clusters in this paper is
* exceedingly small. We list this candidate for completeness, but do not
* use it for subsequent analysis given its suspect nature.
* p = The lens models suggest that this is likely a multiple system at z~6.5.
* q = The lens models suggest that this is likely a multiple system at z~6.6.
* r = In the recent Hubble Frontier Fields data, this candidate is detected in
* the ultradeep optical data and therefore it is very unlikely to be a
* high-redshift galaxy.
*Note (3): Photometric redshift estimate with 2{sigma} (95%) confidence
* intervals (see Section 4). Objects with large lower bounds have a secondary
* peak at lower redshift (z~1-2) that contains at least 5% of the posterior
* probabilty.
*Note (4): Magnification estimate from the lens models (see Section 6). Because
* of uncertainties in the precise location of the critical curves, objects with
* magnifications >100 are simply quoted as such. Objects outside the region
* constrained by the strong lensing models have been assigned a magnification
* of 1.1.
C=============================================================================
C Loading file 'table1.dat' ! Observational Details for the Cluster Sample
C Format for file interpretation
1 format(
+ A16,1X,A5,1X,A8,1X,I2,1X,I2,1X,F5.2,A1,1X,A1,I2,1X,I2,1X,F4.1,
+ A1,1X,F5.3,1X,F5.3,1X,A11,1X,A11)
C Effective file loading
open(unit=1,status='old',file=
+'table1.dat')
write(6,*) '....Loading file: table1.dat'
do i__=1,18
read(1,'(A93)')ar__
read(ar__,1)
+ Cluster,n_Cluster,Alias,RAh,RAm,RAs,n_RAs,DE_,DEd,DEm,DEs,
+ n_DEs,z,E_B_V,Start_Date,End_Date
RAdeg = rNULL__
DEdeg = rNULL__
c Derive coordinates RAdeg and DEdeg from input data
c (RAdeg and DEdeg are set to rNULL__ when unknown)
if(RAh .GT. -180) RAdeg=RAh*15.
if(RAm .GT. -180) RAdeg=RAdeg+RAm/4.
if(RAs .GT. -180) RAdeg=RAdeg+RAs/240.
if(DEd .GE. 0) DEdeg=DEd
if(DEm .GE. 0) DEdeg=DEdeg+DEm/60.
if(DEs .GE. 0) DEdeg=DEdeg+DEs/3600.
if(DE_.EQ.'-'.AND.DEdeg.GE.0) DEdeg=-DEdeg
c ..............Just test output...........
write(6,1)
+ Cluster,n_Cluster,Alias,RAh,RAm,RAs,n_RAs,DE_,DEd,DEm,DEs,
+ n_DEs,z,E_B_V,Start_Date,End_Date
write(6,'(6H Pos: 2F8.4)') RAdeg,DEdeg
c .......End.of.Just test output...........
end do
close(1)
C=============================================================================
C Loading file 'table4.dat' ! Lensed z~6 Candidates Identified Behind
* 17 CLASH Clusters
C Format for file interpretation
2 format(
+ A13,A5,1X,F11.7,1X,F11.7,1X,A1,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,A1,F4.1,1X,
+ F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,
+ 1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F3.1,1X,F3.1,1X,F3.1,1X,A1,F5.1)
C Effective file loading
open(unit=1,status='old',file=
+'table4.dat')
write(6,*) '....Loading file: table4.dat'
do i__=1,196
read(1,'(A133)')ar__1
read(ar__1,2)
+ ID,f_ID,RAdeg_1,DEdeg_1,l_I814mag,I814mag,e_I814mag,l_z850mag,
+ z850mag,e_z850mag,Y105mag,e_Y105mag,Y110mag,e_Y110mag,J125mag,
+ e_J125mag,J140mag,e_J140mag,H160mag,e_H160mag,zphot,E_zphot,
+ e_zphot_1,l_mu,mu
if(ar__1(50:53) .EQ. '') e_I814mag = rNULL__
if(ar__1(61:64) .EQ. '') e_z850mag = rNULL__
if(ar__1(66:69) .EQ. '') Y105mag = rNULL__
if(ar__1(71:74) .EQ. '') e_Y105mag = rNULL__
if(ar__1(76:79) .EQ. '') Y110mag = rNULL__
if(ar__1(81:84) .EQ. '') e_Y110mag = rNULL__
if(ar__1(86:89) .EQ. '') J125mag = rNULL__
if(ar__1(91:94) .EQ. '') e_J125mag = rNULL__
if(ar__1(96:99) .EQ. '') J140mag = rNULL__
if(ar__1(101:104) .EQ. '') e_J140mag = rNULL__
c ..............Just test output...........
write(6,2)
+ ID,f_ID,RAdeg_1,DEdeg_1,l_I814mag,I814mag,e_I814mag,l_z850mag,
+ z850mag,e_z850mag,Y105mag,e_Y105mag,Y110mag,e_Y110mag,J125mag,
+ e_J125mag,J140mag,e_J140mag,H160mag,e_H160mag,zphot,E_zphot,
+ e_zphot_1,l_mu,mu
c .......End.of.Just test output...........
end do
close(1)
C=============================================================================
C Loading file 'table5.dat' ! Lensed z~7 Candidates Identified Behind
* 17 CLASH Clusters
C Format for file interpretation
3 format(
+ A13,A5,1X,F11.7,1X,F11.7,1X,A1,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,A1,F4.1,1X,
+ F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,
+ 1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F3.1,1X,F3.1,1X,F3.1,1X,A1,F5.1)
C Effective file loading
open(unit=1,status='old',file=
+'table5.dat')
write(6,*) '....Loading file: table5.dat'
do i__=1,43
read(1,'(A133)')ar__2
read(ar__2,3)
+ ID_1,f_ID_1,RAdeg_2,DEdeg_2,l_I814mag_1,I814mag_1,e_I814mag_1,
+ l_z850mag_1,z850mag_1,e_z850mag_1,Y105mag_1,e_Y105mag_1,
+ Y110mag_1,e_Y110mag_1,J125mag_1,e_J125mag_1,J140mag_1,
+ e_J140mag_1,H160mag_1,e_H160mag_1,zphot_1,E_zphot_2,e_zphot_3,
+ l_mu_1,mu_1
if(ar__2(50:53) .EQ. '') e_I814mag_1 = rNULL__
if(ar__2(61:64) .EQ. '') e_z850mag_1 = rNULL__
if(ar__2(66:69) .EQ. '') Y105mag_1 = rNULL__
if(ar__2(71:74) .EQ. '') e_Y105mag_1 = rNULL__
if(ar__2(76:79) .EQ. '') Y110mag_1 = rNULL__
if(ar__2(81:84) .EQ. '') e_Y110mag_1 = rNULL__
if(ar__2(86:89) .EQ. '') J125mag_1 = rNULL__
if(ar__2(91:94) .EQ. '') e_J125mag_1 = rNULL__
if(ar__2(96:99) .EQ. '') J140mag_1 = rNULL__
if(ar__2(101:104) .EQ. '') e_J140mag_1 = rNULL__
c ..............Just test output...........
write(6,3)
+ ID_1,f_ID_1,RAdeg_2,DEdeg_2,l_I814mag_1,I814mag_1,e_I814mag_1,
+ l_z850mag_1,z850mag_1,e_z850mag_1,Y105mag_1,e_Y105mag_1,
+ Y110mag_1,e_Y110mag_1,J125mag_1,e_J125mag_1,J140mag_1,
+ e_J140mag_1,H160mag_1,e_H160mag_1,zphot_1,E_zphot_2,e_zphot_3,
+ l_mu_1,mu_1
c .......End.of.Just test output...........
end do
close(1)
C=============================================================================
C Loading file 'table6.dat' ! Lensed z~8 Candidates Identified Behind
* 17 CLASH Clusters
C Format for file interpretation
4 format(
+ A13,A5,1X,F11.7,1X,F11.7,1X,A1,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,A1,F4.1,1X,
+ F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,
+ 1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F3.1,1X,F3.1,1X,F3.1,1X,A1,F5.1)
C Effective file loading
open(unit=1,status='old',file=
+'table6.dat')
write(6,*) '....Loading file: table6.dat'
do i__=1,12
read(1,'(A133)')ar__3
read(ar__3,4)
+ ID_2,f_ID_2,RAdeg_3,DEdeg_3,l_I814mag_2,I814mag_2,e_I814mag_2,
+ l_z850mag_2,z850mag_2,e_z850mag_2,Y105mag_2,e_Y105mag_2,
+ Y110mag_2,e_Y110mag_2,J125mag_2,e_J125mag_2,J140mag_2,
+ e_J140mag_2,H160mag_2,e_H160mag_2,zphot_2,E_zphot_4,e_zphot_5,
+ l_mu_2,mu_2
if(ar__3(50:53) .EQ. '') e_I814mag_2 = rNULL__
if(ar__3(61:64) .EQ. '') e_z850mag_2 = rNULL__
if(ar__3(66:69) .EQ. '') Y105mag_2 = rNULL__
if(ar__3(71:74) .EQ. '') e_Y105mag_2 = rNULL__
if(ar__3(76:79) .EQ. '') Y110mag_2 = rNULL__
if(ar__3(81:84) .EQ. '') e_Y110mag_2 = rNULL__
if(ar__3(86:89) .EQ. '') J125mag_2 = rNULL__
if(ar__3(91:94) .EQ. '') e_J125mag_2 = rNULL__
if(ar__3(96:99) .EQ. '') J140mag_2 = rNULL__
if(ar__3(101:104) .EQ. '') e_J140mag_2 = rNULL__
c ..............Just test output...........
write(6,4)
+ ID_2,f_ID_2,RAdeg_3,DEdeg_3,l_I814mag_2,I814mag_2,e_I814mag_2,
+ l_z850mag_2,z850mag_2,e_z850mag_2,Y105mag_2,e_Y105mag_2,
+ Y110mag_2,e_Y110mag_2,J125mag_2,e_J125mag_2,J140mag_2,
+ e_J140mag_2,H160mag_2,e_H160mag_2,zphot_2,E_zphot_4,e_zphot_5,
+ l_mu_2,mu_2
c .......End.of.Just test output...........
end do
close(1)
C=============================================================================
C Loading file 'table7.dat' ! Lensed Candidates Identified Behind
* RXJ1532.9+3021
C Format for file interpretation
5 format(
+ A13,A5,1X,F11.7,1X,F11.7,1X,A1,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,A1,F4.1,1X,
+ F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,
+ 1X,F4.2,1X,F4.1,1X,F4.2,1X,F3.1,1X,F3.1,1X,F3.1,1X,A1,F5.1)
C Effective file loading
open(unit=1,status='old',file=
+'table7.dat')
write(6,*) '....Loading file: table7.dat'
do i__=1,21
read(1,'(A133)')ar__4
read(ar__4,5)
+ ID_3,f_ID_3,RAdeg_4,DEdeg_4,l_I814mag_3,I814mag_3,e_I814mag_3,
+ l_z850mag_3,z850mag_3,e_z850mag_3,Y105mag_3,e_Y105mag_3,
+ Y110mag_3,e_Y110mag_3,J125mag_3,e_J125mag_3,J140mag_3,
+ e_J140mag_3,H160mag_3,e_H160mag_3,zphot_3,E_zphot_6,e_zphot_7,
+ l_mu_3,mu_3
if(ar__4(50:53) .EQ. '') e_I814mag_3 = rNULL__
if(ar__4(61:64) .EQ. '') e_z850mag_3 = rNULL__
if(ar__4(66:69) .EQ. '') Y105mag_3 = rNULL__
if(ar__4(71:74) .EQ. '') e_Y105mag_3 = rNULL__
if(ar__4(76:79) .EQ. '') Y110mag_3 = rNULL__
if(ar__4(81:84) .EQ. '') e_Y110mag_3 = rNULL__
if(ar__4(86:89) .EQ. '') J125mag_3 = rNULL__
if(ar__4(91:94) .EQ. '') e_J125mag_3 = rNULL__
if(ar__4(96:99) .EQ. '') J140mag_3 = rNULL__
if(ar__4(101:104) .EQ. '') e_J140mag_3 = rNULL__
c ..............Just test output...........
write(6,5)
+ ID_3,f_ID_3,RAdeg_4,DEdeg_4,l_I814mag_3,I814mag_3,e_I814mag_3,
+ l_z850mag_3,z850mag_3,e_z850mag_3,Y105mag_3,e_Y105mag_3,
+ Y110mag_3,e_Y110mag_3,J125mag_3,e_J125mag_3,J140mag_3,
+ e_J140mag_3,H160mag_3,e_H160mag_3,zphot_3,E_zphot_6,e_zphot_7,
+ l_mu_3,mu_3
c .......End.of.Just test output...........
end do
close(1)
C=============================================================================
stop
end