J/ApJ/921/118 Abundances of Gaia EDR3 comoving pairs (Nelson+, 2021)
Distant relatives: the chemical homogeneity of comoving pairs identified in
Gaia.
Nelson T., Ting Y.-S., Hawkins K., Ji A., Kamdar H., El-Badry K.
<Astrophys. J., 921, 118 (2021)>
=2021ApJ...921..118N 2021ApJ...921..118N
ADC_Keywords: Abundances; Stars, double and multiple; Spectra, optical;
Radial velocities
Keywords: Wide binary stars ; Chemical abundances ; Stellar kinematics ;
Late-type stars
Abstract:
Comoving pairs, even at the separations of O(106)au, are a predicted
reservoir of conatal stars. We present detailed chemical abundances of
62 stars in 31 comoving pairs with separations of 102-107 au and
3D velocity differences <2km/s. This sample includes both bound
comoving pairs/wide binaries and unbound comoving pairs. Observations
were taken using the Magellan Inamori Kyocera Echelle (MIKE)
spectrograph on board the Magellan/Clay Telescope at high resolution
(R∼45000) with a typical signal-to-noise ratio of 150pixel-1. With
these spectra, we measure surface abundances for 24 elements,
including Li, C, Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni,
Cu, Zn, Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, La, Nd, and Eu. Taking iron as the
representative element, our sample of wide binaries is chemically
homogeneous at the level of 0.05dex, which agrees with prior studies
on wide binaries. Importantly, even systems at separations
2x105-107au are homogeneous to 0.09dex, as opposed to the random
pairs, which have a dispersion of 0.23dex. Assuming a mixture model of
the wide binaries and random pairs, we find that 73±22% of the
comoving pairs at separations 2x105-107au are conatal. Our results
imply that a much larger parameter space of phase space may be used to
find conatal stars, to study M-dwarfs, star cluster evolution,
exoplanets, chemical tagging, and beyond.
Description:
We observed 33 pairs of comoving stars using the MIKE spectrograph on
board the Magellan/Clay telescope from 2019 June 13-16. These 33 pairs
constitute our main sample. We also observe two additional pairs with
Δv3D>2km/s as a control sample. The instrument employs a blue
and red spectrograph to cover 3350-5000Å (R∼50000) and
4900-9500Å (R∼40000) respectively.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
table1.dat 218 66 Target list for the 33 comoving pairs investigated
in this study
table2.dat 99 33 The 3D separations and velocity differences
between comoving pairs
table3.dat 79 21934 The line list selection
table4.dat 1616 33 Stellar parameters and elemental abundances
derived from BACCHUS
refs.dat 212 66 References (from Table 7)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
VI/10 : Semiempirical gf Values (Kurucz + 1975)
I/345 : Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration, 2018)
I/350 : Gaia EDR3 (Gaia Collaboration, 2020)
J/A+AS/102/435 : Transitions of SI in visible and infra-red (Biemont+ 1993)
J/A+AS/130/541 : Co II oscillator strengths (Raassen+ 1998)
J/A+A/340/300 : Fe II oscillator strengths (Raassen+ 1998)
J/ApJS/167/292 : Laboratory transition prob. for Gd II (Den Hartog+, 2006)
J/ApJS/162/227 : Transition probabilities for SmII (Lawler+, 2006)
J/ApJS/169/120 : Transition probabilities for HfII and Hf (Lawler+, 2007)
J/AJ/133/889 : Faint companions of Hipparcos stars (Lepine+, 2007)
J/ApJ/667/1267 : CrI transition probabilities (Sobeck+, 2007)
J/ApJS/182/51 : Transition prob. of rare earth elements (Lawler+, 2009)
J/A+A/511/A68 : Transitions of CrII (Gurell+, 2010)
J/ApJS/194/35 : Atomic transition probabilities of Mn (Den Hartog+, 2011)
J/ApJ/737/L32 : Abundances of 16 Cyg A and B (Schuler+, 2011)
J/ApJ/756/46 : Lithium abundances in HIP stars (Ramirez+, 2012)
J/ApJ/758/133 : Metallicity profile of M31 HII reg. and PNe (Sanders+, 2012)
J/MNRAS/429/126 : Atmospheric parameters from Fe lines (Ruchti+, 2013)
J/ApJS/208/27 : Sun and HD 84937 TiII log(gf) and abundances (Wood+, 2013)
J/A+A/566/A98 : The Gaia Benchmark Stars - Library (Blanco-Cuaresma+, 2014)
J/ApJS/215/23 : FeI radiative lifetimes (Den Hartog+, 2014)
J/A+A/564/A133 : Gaia FGK benchmark stars: metallicity (Jofre+, 2014)
J/A+A/571/A47 : Extensive linelist of CH in stellar atm. (Masseron+, 2014)
J/MNRAS/441/3127 : FeI oscillator strengths for Gaia-ESO (Ruffoni+, 2014)
J/ApJS/211/20 : NiI transition probability measurements (Wood+, 2014)
J/ApJ/815/63 : SDSS wide double white dwarfs spectroscopy (Andrews+, 2015)
J/AJ/151/144 : ASPCAP weights for APOGEE chemical elements (Garcia+, 2016)
J/A+A/588/A81 : Line list & abundances of the binary zet2 Ret (Saffe+, 2016)
J/ApJ/819/19 : Equivalent widths of WASP-94A and WASP-94B (Teske+, 2016)
J/MNRAS/472/675 : Wide binaries in Tycho-Gaia: search method (Andrews+, 2017)
J/AJ/153/257 : Comoving stars in Gaia DR1 (Oh+, 2017)
J/A+A/604/L4 : HAT-P-4 & TYC 2569-744-1 abundances & spectra (Saffe+, 2017)
J/MNRAS/479/1332 : Binaries with F, G or K primaries & M dwarfs (Montes+, 2018)
J/AJ/158/122 : Star formation history of the MW (Kounkel+, 2019)
J/A+A/633/A99 : Gaia DR2 open clusters in the MW. II (Cantat-Gaudin+, 2020)
J/MNRAS/496/2422 : Abund. of 42 Pisces-Eridanus stream stars (Hawkins+, 2020)
J/MNRAS/492/1164 : Abundances of Gaia DR2 wide binaries (Hawkins+, 2020)
J/A+A/645/A106 : Atomic data for the Gaia-ESO Survey (Heiter+, 2021)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 19 I19 --- Gaia Gaia EDR3 identifier
21- 28 F8.4 deg RAdeg [189.8/356.1] Gaia EDR3 Right Ascension
(ICRS) at Ep=2016.0
30- 37 F8.4 deg DEdeg [-81/-1.6] Gaia EDR3 Declination (ICRS)
at Ep=2016.0
39- 44 F6.3 mas Plx [4/25.2] Gaia EDR3 parallax
46- 50 F5.3 mas e_Plx [0.01/0.2] Uncertainty in Plx
52- 55 F4.2 mag Gmag [2/6] Gaia EDR3 G band magnitude
57- 60 F4.2 mag Bp-Rp [0.5/1.1] Gaia EDR3 (blue-red) passband
color index
62- 67 F6.2 km/s RVel [-67/44.3] Radial velocity
69- 72 F4.2 km/s e_RVel [0.02/0.3] Uncertainty in RVel
74- 78 F5.1 --- SNR-B [73/235] MIKE blue spectrograph SNR
80- 84 F5.1 --- SNR-R [92/403] MIKE red spectrograph SNR
86- 91 F6.4 arcsec e_RAdeg [0.007/0.07] Uncertainty in RAdeg
93- 98 F6.4 arcsec e_DEdeg [0.007/0.1] Uncertainty in DEdeg
100- 108 F9.4 mas/yr pmRA [-256/207] Gaia EDR3 proper motion along RA
110- 115 F6.4 mas/yr e_pmRA [0.009/0.1] Uncertainty in pmRA
117- 125 F9.4 mas/yr pmDE [-253/25] Gaia EDR3 proper motion along DE
127- 132 F6.4 mas/yr e_pmDE [0.009/0.2] Uncertainty in pmDE
134- 140 F7.4 --- RADEcor [-0.6/0.5] RA and DE correlation
142- 148 F7.4 --- RAPlxcor [-0.5/0.4] Right Ascension and parallax
correlation
150- 156 F7.4 --- RApmRAcor [-0.5/0.4] Right Ascension and RA proper
motion correlation
158- 164 F7.4 --- RApmDEcor [-0.5/0.4] Right Ascension and DE proper
motion correlation
166- 172 F7.4 --- DEPlxcor [-0.6/0.2] Declination and parallax
correlation
174- 180 F7.4 --- DEpmRAcor [-0.6/0.5] Declination and RA proper
motion correlation
182- 188 F7.4 --- DEpmDEcor [-0.8/0.7] Declination and DE proper
motion correlation
190- 196 F7.4 --- PlxpmRAcor [-0.5/0.4] Parallax and RA proper motion
correlation
198- 204 F7.4 --- PlxpmDEcor [-0.4/0.5] Parallax and DE proper motion
correlation
206- 212 F7.4 --- pmRApmDEcor [-0.6/0.4] RA proper motion and DE proper
motion correlation
214- 217 A4 --- ID Short identifier
218 A1 --- m_ID ID component
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 19 I19 --- CompA Gaia EDR3 identifier for component A
21- 39 I19 --- CompB Gaia EDR3 identifier for component B
41- 44 A4 --- ID Short identifier
46- 53 E8.2 AU Sep [1220/18700000] The 3D separation (1)
55- 62 E8.2 AU e_Sep [7670/178000] Uncertainty in Sep
64- 67 F4.2 km/s DelV3D [0.26/3.8] Component's 3D velocity difference
69- 72 F4.2 km/s e_DelV3D [0.02/0.2] Uncertainty in DelV3D
74- 81 E8.2 AU Sgeo [277/28200]? Geometric separation (2)
83- 90 E8.2 AU b_Sgeo [27.2/2770]? Lower 16 percentile boundary on Sgeo
92- 99 E8.2 AU B_Sgeo [121/12300]? Upper 84 percentile boundary on Sgeo
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Calculated solely from Gaia eDR3 astrometry and the spectroscopic RV.
As discussed in Section 2.1, the separations calculated this way may
overestimate the true separation between the close comoving
components.
Note (2): For the subset of comoving pairs suspected to be wide binaries, we
invoke a geometric prior based to infer the 3D separations based on
the better measured 2D projected separations (Appendix A). We only
perform this correction for the close comoving pairs. The results in
this paper assumes Sgeo for close comoving pairs (i.e., S<2e5AU)
and S for for the far comoving pairs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 A4 --- ID Short identifier
5 A1 --- m_ID ID component
7- 11 A5 --- Ion Identifier
13- 19 F7.2 0.1nm lambda [4205/8933] Wavelength; Angstroms
21- 26 F6.3 [-] loggf [-10/0.57] log oscillator strength
28- 66 A39 --- Ref Reference(s) (see refs.dat file)
68- 73 F6.3 eV ExPot [0/14.8] Excitation potential
75- 79 F5.3 [-] logA [0.36/8.76] log absolute abundance (1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Before subtracting the Solar abundances) derived for this line.
The solar abundances adopted are from Grevesse+ (2007SSRv..130..105G 2007SSRv..130..105G)
except where described otherwise in Section 3.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table4.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 19 I19 --- CompA Component A Gaia EDR3 identifier
21- 39 I19 --- CompB Component B Gaia EDR3 identifier
41- 44 I4 K TeffA [5157/6787] Component A effective
temperature
46- 47 I2 K e_TeffA [0/70] Uncertainty in TeffA
49- 52 F4.2 [cm/s2] loggA [3.9/4.7] Component A log surface
gravity
54- 57 F4.2 [cm/s2] e_loggA [0.02/0.4] Uncertainty in log(g)A
59- 62 F4.2 km/s xiA [0.65/1.73] Component A microturbulence
64- 67 F4.2 km/s e_xiA [0.03/0.08] Uncertainty in xiA
69- 72 I4 K TeffB [5052/6701] Component B effective
temperature
74- 75 I2 K e_TeffB [1/65] Uncertainty in TeffB
77- 80 F4.2 [cm/s2] loggB [3.8/4.8] Component B log surface
gravity
82- 85 F4.2 [cm/s2] e_loggB [0.05/0.5] Uncertainty in log(g)B
87- 90 F4.2 km/s xiB [0.42/1.71] Component B microturbulence
92- 95 F4.2 km/s e_xiB [0.03/0.08] Uncertainty in xiB
97- 101 F5.2 [Sun] del[Fe/H] [-0.17/0.15] Differential method [Fe/H]
(1)
103- 106 F4.2 [Sun] del[Fe/H]l [0/0.01] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Fe/H]
108- 111 F4.2 [Sun] del[Fe/H]t [0.01/0.12] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Fe/H]
113- 116 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Fe/H] [0.02/0.12] Uncertainty in del[Fe/H] (2)
118- 122 F5.2 [Sun] [Fe/H]A [-0.35/0.38] Component A nLBL method
[Fe/H]A
124- 127 F4.2 [Sun] [Fe/H]Al [0.01] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Fe/H]A
129- 132 F4.2 [Sun] [Fe/H]At [0.01/0.15] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Fe/H]A
134- 137 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Fe/H]A [0.01/0.15] Uncertainty in [Fe/H]A
139- 143 F5.2 [Sun] [Fe/H]B [-0.3/0.34] Component B nLBL method
[Fe/H]B
145- 148 F4.2 [Sun] [Fe/H]Bl [0.01] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Fe/H]B
150- 153 F4.2 [Sun] [Fe/H]Bt [0.01/0.04] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Fe/H]B
155- 158 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Fe/H]B [0.02/0.05] Uncertainty in [Fe/H]B
160- 164 F5.2 [Sun] del[Na/H] [-0.2/0.2] Differential method [Na/H]
(1)
166- 169 F4.2 [Sun] del[Na/H]l [0/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Na/H]
171- 174 F4.2 [Sun] del[Na/H]t [0.02/0.05] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Na/H]
176- 179 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Na/H] [0.02/0.05] Uncertainty in del[Na/H] (2)
181- 185 F5.2 [Sun] [Na/H]A [-0.25/0.57] Component A nLBL method
[Na/H]A
187- 190 F4.2 [Sun] [Na/H]Al [0.01/0.06] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Na/H]A
192- 195 F4.2 [Sun] [Na/H]At [0.01/0.07] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Na/H]A
197- 200 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Na/H]A [0.02/0.07] Uncertainty in [Na/H]A
202- 206 F5.2 [Sun] [Na/H]B [-0.18/0.53] Component B nLBL method
[Na/H]B
208- 211 F4.2 [Sun] [Na/H]Bl [0.01/0.05] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Na/H]B
213- 216 F4.2 [Sun] [Na/H]Bt [0.01/0.05] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Na/H]B
218- 221 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Na/H]B [0.02/0.06] Uncertainty in [Na/H]B
223- 227 F5.2 [Sun] del[Mg/H] [-0.13/0.14] Differential method [Mg/H]
(1)
229- 232 F4.2 [Sun] del[Mg/H]l [0/0.1] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Mg/H]
234- 237 F4.2 [Sun] del[Mg/H]t [0.01/0.05] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Mg/H]
239- 242 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Mg/H] [0.01/0.1] Uncertainty in del[Mg/H] (2)
244- 248 F5.2 [Sun] [Mg/H]A [-0.17/0.56] Component A nLBL method
[Mg/H]A
250- 253 F4.2 [Sun] [Mg/H]Al [0.03/0.09] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Mg/H]A
255- 258 F4.2 [Sun] [Mg/H]At [0.01/0.07] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Mg/H]A
260- 263 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Mg/H]A [0.03/0.11] Uncertainty in [Mg/H]A
265- 269 F5.2 [Sun] [Mg/H]B [-0.15/0.52] Component B nLBL method
[Mg/H]B
271- 274 F4.2 [Sun] [Mg/H]Bl [0.04/0.09] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Mg/H]B
276- 279 F4.2 [Sun] [Mg/H]Bt [0.01/0.05] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Mg/H]B
281- 284 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Mg/H]B [0.04/0.09] Uncertainty in [Mg/H]B
286- 290 F5.2 [Sun] del[Al/H] [-0.15/0.15] Differential method [Al/H]
(1)
292- 295 F4.2 [Sun] del[Al/H]l [0/0.1] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Al/H]
297- 300 F4.2 [Sun] del[Al/H]t [0.01/0.02] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Al/H]
302- 305 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Al/H] [0.01/0.1] Uncertainty in del[Al/H] (2)
307- 311 F5.2 [Sun] [Al/H]A [-0.16/0.5] Component A nLBL method
[Al/H]A
313- 316 F4.2 [Sun] [Al/H]Al [0/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Al/H]A
318- 321 F4.2 [Sun] [Al/H]At [0/0.03] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Al/H]A
323- 326 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Al/H]A [0.01/0.03] Uncertainty in [Al/H]A
328- 332 F5.2 [Sun] [Al/H]B [-0.13/0.45] Component B nLBL method
[Al/H]B
334- 337 F4.2 [Sun] [Al/H]Bl [0/0.1] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Al/H]B
339- 342 F4.2 [Sun] [Al/H]Bt [0/0.03] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Al/H]B
344- 347 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Al/H]B [0.01/0.1] Uncertainty in [Al/H]B
349- 353 F5.2 [Sun] del[Si/H] [-0.13/0.15] Differential method [Si/H]
(1)
355- 358 F4.2 [Sun] del[Si/H]l [0/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Si/H]
360- 363 F4.2 [Sun] del[Si/H]t [0.01/0.05] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Si/H]
365- 368 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Si/H] [0.01/0.05] Uncertainty in del[Si/H] (2)
370- 374 F5.2 [Sun] [Si/H]A [-0.28/0.43] Component A nLBL method
[Si/H]A
376- 379 F4.2 [Sun] [Si/H]Al [0.02/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Si/H]A
381- 384 F4.2 [Sun] [Si/H]At [0.01/0.06] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Si/H]A
386- 389 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Si/H]A [0.02/0.06] Uncertainty in [Si/H]A
391- 395 F5.2 [Sun] [Si/H]B [-0.23/0.43] Component B nLBL method
[Si/H]B
397- 400 F4.2 [Sun] [Si/H]Bl [0.02/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Si/H]B
402- 405 F4.2 [Sun] [Si/H]Bt [0.01/0.08] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Si/H]B
407- 410 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Si/H]B [0.02/0.09] Uncertainty in [Si/H]B
412- 416 F5.2 [Sun] del[Ca/H] [-0.17/0.13] Differential method [Ca/H]
(1)
418- 421 F4.2 [Sun] del[Ca/H]l [0/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Ca/H]
423- 426 F4.2 [Sun] del[Ca/H]t [0.02/0.15] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Ca/H]
428- 431 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Ca/H] [0.03/0.15] Uncertainty in del[Ca/H] (2)
433- 437 F5.2 [Sun] [Ca/H]A [-0.23/0.4] Component A nLBL method
[Ca/H]A
439- 442 F4.2 [Sun] [Ca/H]Al [0.01/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Ca/H]A
444- 447 F4.2 [Sun] [Ca/H]At [0.02/0.16] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Ca/H]A
449- 452 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Ca/H]A [0.03/0.16] Uncertainty in [Ca/H]A
454- 458 F5.2 [Sun] [Ca/H]B [-0.21/0.34] Component B nLBL method
[Ca/H]B
460- 463 F4.2 [Sun] [Ca/H]Bl [0.01/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Ca/H]B
465- 468 F4.2 [Sun] [Ca/H]Bt [0.03/0.09] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Ca/H]B
470- 473 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Ca/H]B [0.04/0.09] Uncertainty in [Ca/H]B
475- 479 F5.2 [Sun] del[Sc/H] [-0.21/0.19] Differential method [Sc/H]
(1)
481- 484 F4.2 [Sun] del[Sc/H]l [0/0.06] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Sc/H]
486- 489 F4.2 [Sun] del[Sc/H]t [0.04/0.1] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Sc/H]
491- 494 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Sc/H] [0.05/0.11] Uncertainty in del[Sc/H] (2)
496- 500 F5.2 [Sun] [Sc/H]A [-0.15/0.57] Component A nLBL method
[Sc/H]A
502- 505 F4.2 [Sun] [Sc/H]Al [0.02/0.04] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Sc/H]A
507- 510 F4.2 [Sun] [Sc/H]At [0.01/0.14] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Sc/H]A
512- 515 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Sc/H]A [0.03/0.14] Uncertainty in [Sc/H]A
517- 521 F5.2 [Sun] [Sc/H]B [-0.09/0.51] Component B nLBL method
[Sc/H]B
523- 526 F4.2 [Sun] [Sc/H]Bl [0.02/0.05] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Sc/H]B
528- 531 F4.2 [Sun] [Sc/H]Bt [0.01/0.11] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Sc/H]B
533- 536 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Sc/H]B [0.03/0.12] Uncertainty in [Sc/H]B
538- 542 F5.2 [Sun] del[Ti/H] [-0.14/0.18] Differential method [Ti/H]
(1)
544- 547 F4.2 [Sun] del[Ti/H]l [0/0.02] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Ti/H]
549- 552 F4.2 [Sun] del[Ti/H]t [0.02/0.06] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Ti/H]
554- 557 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Ti/H] [0.03/0.06] Uncertainty in del[Ti/H] (2)
559- 563 F5.2 [Sun] [Ti/H]A [-0.31/0.39] Component A nLBL method
[Ti/H]A
565- 568 F4.2 [Sun] [Ti/H]Al [0.01/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Ti/H]A
570- 573 F4.2 [Sun] [Ti/H]At [0.01/0.09] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Ti/H]A
575- 578 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Ti/H]A [0.02/0.09] Uncertainty in [Ti/H]A
580- 584 F5.2 [Sun] [Ti/H]B [-0.22/0.31] Component Bdifferential
method [Ti/H]
586- 589 F4.2 [Sun] [Ti/H]Bl [0.01/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Ti/H]B
591- 594 F4.2 [Sun] [Ti/H]Bt [0.02/0.07] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Ti/H]B
596- 599 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Ti/H]B [0.02/0.08] Uncertainty in [Ti/H]B
601- 605 F5.2 [Sun] del[V/H] [-0.17/0.22] Differential method [V/H]
(1)
607- 610 F4.2 [Sun] del[V/H]l [0/0.06] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [V/H]
612- 615 F4.2 [Sun] del[V/H]t [0.02/0.04] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [V/H]
617- 620 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[V/H] [0.03/0.06] Uncertainty in del[V/H] (2)
622- 626 F5.2 [Sun] [V/H]A [-0.47/0.36] Component A nLBL method
[V/H]A
628- 631 F4.2 [Sun] [V/H]Al [0.02/0.06] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [V/H]A
633- 636 F4.2 [Sun] [V/H]At [0.01/0.23] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [V/H]A
638- 641 F4.2 [Sun] e_[V/H]A [0.02/0.24] Uncertainty in [V/H]A
643- 647 F5.2 [Sun] [V/H]B [-0.4/0.27] Component B nLBL method
[V/H]B
649- 652 F4.2 [Sun] [V/H]Bl [0.01/0.05] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [V/H]B
654- 657 F4.2 [Sun] [V/H]Bt [0.01/0.15] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [V/H]B
659- 662 F4.2 [Sun] e_[V/H]B [0.02/0.16] Uncertainty in [V/H]B
664- 668 F5.2 [Sun] del[Cr/H] [-0.14/0.14] Differential method [Cr/H]
(1)
670- 673 F4.2 [Sun] del[Cr/H]l [0.01/0.05] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Cr/H]
675- 678 F4.2 [Sun] del[Cr/H]t [0.02/0.04] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Cr/H]
680- 683 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Cr/H] [0.03/0.06] Uncertainty in del[Cr/H] (2)
685- 689 F5.2 [Sun] [Cr/H]A [-0.39/0.29] Component A nLBL method
[Cr/H]A
691- 694 F4.2 [Sun] [Cr/H]Al [0.01/0.05] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Cr/H]A
696- 699 F4.2 [Sun] [Cr/H]At [0.01/0.11] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Cr/H]A
701- 704 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Cr/H]A [0.02/0.11] Uncertainty in [Cr/H]A
706- 710 F5.2 [Sun] [Cr/H]B [-0.37/0.25] Component B nLBL method
[Cr/H]B
712- 715 F4.2 [Sun] [Cr/H]Bl [0.01/0.05] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Cr/H]B
717- 720 F4.2 [Sun] [Cr/H]Bt [0.01/0.06] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Cr/H]B
722- 725 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Cr/H]B [0.02/0.08] Uncertainty in [Cr/H]B
727- 731 F5.2 [Sun] del[Mn/H] [-0.24/0.22] Differential method [Mn/H]
(1)
733- 736 F4.2 [Sun] del[Mn/H]l [0/0.05] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Mn/H]
738- 741 F4.2 [Sun] del[Mn/H]t [0.03/0.04] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Mn/H]
743- 746 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Mn/H] [0.03/0.06] Uncertainty in del[Mn/H] (2)
748- 752 F5.2 [Sun] [Mn/H]A [-0.51/0.37] Component A nLBL method
[Mn/H]A
754- 757 F4.2 [Sun] [Mn/H]Al [0.01/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Mn/H]A
759- 762 F4.2 [Sun] [Mn/H]At [0.01/0.08] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Mn/H]A
764- 767 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Mn/H]A [0.02/0.08] Uncertainty in [Mn/H]A
769- 773 F5.2 [Sun] [Mn/H]B [-0.46/0.27] Component B nLBL method
[Mn/H]B
775- 778 F4.2 [Sun] [Mn/H]Bl [0.01/0.04] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Mn/H]B
780- 783 F4.2 [Sun] [Mn/H]Bt [0.01/0.06] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Mn/H]B
785- 788 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Mn/H]B [0.03/0.07] Uncertainty in [Mn/H]B
790- 794 F5.2 [Sun] del[Co/H] [-0.29/0.22] Differential method [Co/H]
(1)
796- 799 F4.2 [Sun] del[Co/H]l [0.01/0.17] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Co/H]
801- 804 F4.2 [Sun] del[Co/H]t [0.02/0.03] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Co/H]
806- 809 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Co/H] [0.03/0.17] Uncertainty in del[Co/H] (2)
811- 815 F5.2 [Sun] [Co/H]A [-0.33/0.31] Component A nLBL method
[Co/H]A
817- 820 F4.2 [Sun] [Co/H]Al [0.02/0.11] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Co/H]A
822- 825 F4.2 [Sun] [Co/H]At [0.01/0.15] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Co/H]A
827- 830 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Co/H]A [0.02/0.18] Uncertainty in [Co/H]A
832- 836 F5.2 [Sun] [Co/H]B [-0.26/0.34] Component B nLBL method
[Co/H]B
838- 841 F4.2 [Sun] [Co/H]Bl [0.02/0.08] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Co/H]B
843- 846 F4.2 [Sun] [Co/H]Bt [0.01/0.13] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Co/H]B
848- 851 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Co/H]B [0.03/0.13] Uncertainty in [Co/H]B
853- 857 F5.2 [Sun] del[Ni/H] [-0.19/0.21] Differential method [Ni/H]
(1)
859- 862 F4.2 [Sun] del[Ni/H]l [0/0.02] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Ni/H]
864- 867 F4.2 [Sun] del[Ni/H]t [0.02/0.11] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Ni/H]
869- 872 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Ni/H] [0.02/0.11] Uncertainty in del[Ni/H] (2)
874- 878 F5.2 [Sun] [Ni/H]A [-0.43/0.38] Component A nLBL method
[Ni/H]A
880- 883 F4.2 [Sun] [Ni/H]Al [0.02/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Ni/H]A
885- 888 F4.2 [Sun] [Ni/H]At [0.01/0.15] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Ni/H]A
890- 893 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Ni/H]A [0.03/0.15] Uncertainty in [Ni/H]A
895- 899 F5.2 [Sun] [Ni/H]B [-0.33/0.36] Component B nLBL method
[Ni/H]B
901- 904 F4.2 [Sun] [Ni/H]Bl [0.02/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Ni/H]B
906- 909 F4.2 [Sun] [Ni/H]Bt [0.01/0.05] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Ni/H]B
911- 914 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Ni/H]B [0.03/0.06] Uncertainty in [Ni/H]B
916- 920 F5.2 [Sun] del[Cu/H] [-0.18/0.21] Differential method [Cu/H]
(1)
922- 925 F4.2 [Sun] del[Cu/H]l [0/0.04] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Cu/H]
927- 930 F4.2 [Sun] del[Cu/H]t [0.02/0.06] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Cu/H]
932- 935 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Cu/H] [0.03/0.06] Uncertainty in del[Cu/H] (2)
937- 941 F5.2 [Sun] [Cu/H]A [-0.51/0.28] Component A nLBL method
[Cu/H]A
943- 946 F4.2 [Sun] [Cu/H]Al [0.01/0.07] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Cu/H]A
948- 951 F4.2 [Sun] [Cu/H]At [0.01/0.1] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Cu/H]A
953- 956 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Cu/H]A [0.03/0.11] Uncertainty in [Cu/H]A
958- 962 F5.2 [Sun] [Cu/H]B [-0.44/0.3] Component B nLBL method
[Cu/H]B
964- 967 F4.2 [Sun] [Cu/H]Bl [0.01/0.05] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Cu/H]B
969- 972 F4.2 [Sun] [Cu/H]Bt [0.01/0.07] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Cu/H]B
974- 977 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Cu/H]B [0.03/0.08] Uncertainty in [Cu/H]B
979- 983 F5.2 [Sun] del[Zn/H] [-0.21/0.14] Differential method [Zn/H]
(1)
985- 988 F4.2 [Sun] del[Zn/H]l [0/0.04] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Zn/H]
990- 993 F4.2 [Sun] del[Zn/H]t [0.02/0.17] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Zn/H]
995- 998 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Zn/H] [0.02/0.17] Uncertainty in del[Zn/H] (2)
1000- 1004 F5.2 [Sun] [Zn/H]A [-0.5/0.21] Component A nLBL method
[Zn/H]A
1006- 1009 F4.2 [Sun] [Zn/H]Al [0/0.06] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Zn/H]A
1011- 1014 F4.2 [Sun] [Zn/H]At [0.01/0.19] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Zn/H]A
1016- 1019 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Zn/H]A [0.02/0.19] Uncertainty in [Zn/H]A
1021- 1025 F5.2 [Sun] [Zn/H]B [-0.44/0.26] Component B nLBL method
[Zn/H]B
1027- 1030 F4.2 [Sun] [Zn/H]Bl [0/0.1] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Zn/H]B
1032- 1035 F4.2 [Sun] [Zn/H]Bt [0.01/0.05] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Zn/H]B
1037- 1040 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Zn/H]B [0.02/0.1] Uncertainty in [Zn/H]B
1042- 1046 F5.2 [Sun] del[Sr/H] [-0.34/0.13]? Differential method
[Sr/H] (1)
1048- 1051 F4.2 [Sun] del[Sr/H]l [0.1/0.1]? Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Sr/H]
1053- 1056 F4.2 [Sun] del[Sr/H]t [0.02/0.43] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Sr/H]
1058- 1061 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Sr/H] [0.1/0.44]? Uncertainty in del[Sr/H] (2)
1063- 1067 F5.2 [Sun] [Sr/H]A [-0.57/0.53] Component A nLBL method
[Sr/H]A
1069- 1072 F4.2 [Sun] [Sr/H]Al [0.02/0.17] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Sr/H]A
1074- 1077 F4.2 [Sun] [Sr/H]At [0.01/0.34] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Sr/H]A
1079- 1082 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Sr/H]A [0.06/0.38] Uncertainty in [Sr/H]A
1084- 1088 F5.2 [Sun] [Sr/H]B [-0.61/0.21]? Component B nLBL method
[Sr/H]B
1090- 1093 F4.2 [Sun] [Sr/H]Bl [0/0.17]? Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Sr/H]B
1095- 1098 F4.2 [Sun] [Sr/H]Bt [0.02/0.24] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Sr/H]B
1100- 1103 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Sr/H]B [0.04/0.29]? Uncertainty in [Sr/H]B
1105- 1109 F5.2 [Sun] del[Y/H] [-0.25/0.16] Differential method [Y/H]
(1)
1111- 1114 F4.2 [Sun] del[Y/H]l [0/0.06] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Y/H]
1116- 1119 F4.2 [Sun] del[Y/H]t [0.05/0.08] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Y/H]
1121- 1124 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Y/H] [0.05/0.1] Uncertainty in del[Y/H] (2)
1126- 1130 F5.2 [Sun] [Y/H]A [-0.63/0.23] Component A nLBL method
[Y/H]A
1132- 1135 F4.2 [Sun] [Y/H]Al [0/0.07] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Y/H]A
1137- 1140 F4.2 [Sun] [Y/H]At [0.02/0.2] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Y/H]A
1142- 1145 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Y/H]A [0.04/0.21] Uncertainty in [Y/H]A
1147- 1151 F5.2 [Sun] [Y/H]B [-0.6/0.12] Component B nLBL method
[Y/H]B
1153- 1156 F4.2 [Sun] [Y/H]Bl [0.01/0.07] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Y/H]B
1158- 1161 F4.2 [Sun] [Y/H]Bt [0.02/0.12] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Y/H]B
1163- 1166 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Y/H]B [0.04/0.13] Uncertainty in [Y/H]B
1168- 1172 F5.2 [Sun] del[Zr/H] [-0.25/0.22] Differential method [Zr/H]
(1)
1174- 1177 F4.2 [Sun] del[Zr/H]l [0/0.06] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Zr/H]
1179- 1182 F4.2 [Sun] del[Zr/H]t [0.02/0.08] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Zr/H]
1184- 1187 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Zr/H] [0.03/0.09] Uncertainty in del[Zr/H] (2)
1189- 1193 F5.2 [Sun] [Zr/H]A [-0.48/0.42] Component A nLBL method
[Zr/H]A
1195- 1198 F4.2 [Sun] [Zr/H]Al [0/0.07] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Zr/H]A
1200- 1203 F4.2 [Sun] [Zr/H]At [0.04/0.18] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Zr/H]A
1205- 1208 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Zr/H]A [0.04/0.18] Uncertainty in [Zr/H]A
1210- 1214 F5.2 [Sun] [Zr/H]B [-0.33/0.3] Component B nLBL method
[Zr/H]B
1216- 1219 F4.2 [Sun] [Zr/H]Bl [0.01/0.09] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Zr/H]B
1221- 1224 F4.2 [Sun] [Zr/H]Bt [0.03/0.15] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Zr/H]B
1226- 1229 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Zr/H]B [0.04/0.16] Uncertainty in [Zr/H]B
1231- 1235 F5.2 [Sun] del[Ba/H] [-0.23/0.08] Differential method [Ba/H]
(1)
1237- 1240 F4.2 [Sun] del[Ba/H]l [0/0.1] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Ba/H]
1242- 1245 F4.2 [Sun] del[Ba/H]t [0.02/0.36] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Ba/H]
1247- 1250 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Ba/H] [0.02/0.37] Uncertainty in del[Ba/H] (2)
1252- 1256 F5.2 [Sun] [Ba/H]A [-0.21/0.61] Component A nLBL method
[Ba/H]A
1258- 1261 F4.2 [Sun] [Ba/H]Al [0.02/0.11] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Ba/H]A
1263- 1266 F4.2 [Sun] [Ba/H]At [0.01/0.37] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Ba/H]A
1268- 1271 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Ba/H]A [0.03/0.38] Uncertainty in [Ba/H]A
1273- 1277 F5.2 [Sun] [Ba/H]B [-0.22/0.56] Component B nLBL method
[Ba/H]B
1279- 1282 F4.2 [Sun] [Ba/H]Bl [0.02/0.11] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Ba/H]B
1284- 1287 F4.2 [Sun] [Ba/H]Bt [0.02/0.07] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Ba/H]B
1289- 1292 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Ba/H]B [0.03/0.11] Uncertainty in [Ba/H]B
1294- 1298 F5.2 [Sun] del[La/H] [-0.42/0.19]? Differential method
[La/H] (1)
1300- 1303 F4.2 [Sun] del[La/H]l [0/0.19]? Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [La/H]
1305- 1308 F4.2 [Sun] del[La/H]t [0.04/0.12] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [La/H]
1310- 1313 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[La/H] [0.04/0.2]? Uncertainty in del[La/H] (2)
1315- 1319 F5.2 [Sun] [La/H]A [-0.19/0.48] Component A nLBL method
[La/H]A
1321- 1324 F4.2 [Sun] [La/H]Al [0/0.14] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [La/H]A
1326- 1329 F4.2 [Sun] [La/H]At [0.01/0.22] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [La/H]A
1331- 1334 F4.2 [Sun] e_[La/H]A [0.03/0.26] Uncertainty in [La/H]A
1336- 1340 F5.2 [Sun] [La/H]B [-0.08/0.4]? Component B nLBL method
[La/H]B
1342- 1345 F4.2 [Sun] [La/H]Bl [0/0.11]? Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [La/H]B
1347- 1350 F4.2 [Sun] [La/H]Bt [0.02/0.28] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [La/H]B
1352- 1355 F4.2 [Sun] e_[La/H]B [0.04/0.3]? Uncertainty in [La/H]B
1357- 1361 F5.2 [Sun] del[Nd/H] [-0.21/0.22] Differential method [Nd/H]
(1)
1363- 1366 F4.2 [Sun] del[Nd/H]l [0/0.18] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Nd/H]
1368- 1371 F4.2 [Sun] del[Nd/H]t [0.04/0.09] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Nd/H]
1373- 1376 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Nd/H] [0.05/0.18] Uncertainty in del[Nd/H] (2)
1378- 1382 F5.2 [Sun] [Nd/H]A [-0.37/0.3] Component A nLBL method
[Nd/H]A
1384- 1387 F4.2 [Sun] [Nd/H]Al [0/0.13] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Nd/H]A
1389- 1392 F4.2 [Sun] [Nd/H]At [0.05/0.23] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Nd/H]A
1394- 1397 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Nd/H]A [0.06/0.24] Uncertainty in [Nd/H]A
1399- 1403 F5.2 [Sun] [Nd/H]B [-0.22/0.31] Component B nLBL method
[Nd/H]B
1405- 1408 F4.2 [Sun] [Nd/H]Bl [0.01/0.13] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Nd/H]B
1410- 1413 F4.2 [Sun] [Nd/H]Bt [0.03/0.19] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Nd/H]B
1415- 1418 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Nd/H]B [0.04/0.21] Uncertainty in [Nd/H]B
1420- 1424 F5.2 [Sun] del[Eu/H] [-0.26/0.25]? Differential method
[Eu/H] (1)
1426- 1429 F4.2 [Sun] del[Eu/H]l [0/0.12]? Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Eu/H]
1431- 1434 F4.2 [Sun] del[Eu/H]t [0.04/0.15] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Eu/H]
1436- 1439 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Eu/H] [0.06/0.18]? Uncertainty in del[Eu/H]
(2)
1441- 1445 F5.2 [Sun] [Eu/H]A [-0.11/0.48]? Component A nLBL method
[Eu/H]A
1447- 1450 F4.2 [Sun] [Eu/H]Al [0/0.14]? Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Eu/H]A
1452- 1455 F4.2 [Sun] [Eu/H]At [0.03/0.21] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Eu/H]A
1457- 1460 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Eu/H]A [0.06/0.23]? Uncertainty in [Eu/H]A
1462- 1466 F5.2 [Sun] [Eu/H]B [-0.03/0.48]? Component B nLBL method
[Eu/H]B
1468- 1471 F4.2 [Sun] [Eu/H]Bl [0.03/0.18]? Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Eu/H]B
1473- 1476 F4.2 [Sun] [Eu/H]Bt [0.03/0.33] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Eu/H]B
1478- 1481 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Eu/H]B [0.1/0.34]? Uncertainty in [Eu/H]B
1483- 1487 F5.2 [Sun] del[Li/H] [-1.01/0.74]? Differential method
[Li/H] (1)
1489- 1492 F4.2 [Sun] del[Li/H]l [0.1/0.1]? Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Li/H]
1494- 1497 F4.2 [Sun] del[Li/H]t [0.02/0.05] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Li/H]
1499- 1502 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[Li/H] [0.1/0.1]? Uncertainty in del[Li/H] (2)
1504- 1507 F4.2 [Sun] [Li/H]A [0.63/1.46]? Component A nLBL method
[Li/H]A
1509- 1512 F4.2 [Sun] [Li/H]Al [0.1/0.1]? Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Li/H]A
1514- 1517 F4.2 [Sun] [Li/H]At [0/0.05] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Li/H]A
1519- 1522 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Li/H]A [0.1/0.11]? Uncertainty in [Li/H]A
1524- 1527 F4.2 [Sun] [Li/H]B [0.04/1.92]? Component B nLBL method
[Li/H]B
1529- 1532 F4.2 [Sun] [Li/H]Bl [0.1/0.1]? Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [Li/H]B
1534- 1537 F4.2 [Sun] [Li/H]Bt [0.01/0.04] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [Li/H]B
1539- 1542 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Li/H]B [0.1/0.11]? Uncertainty in [Li/H]B
1544- 1548 F5.2 [Sun] del[C/H] [-0.18/0.14] Differential method [C/H]
(1)
1550- 1553 F4.2 [Sun] del[C/H]l [0/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [C/H]
1555- 1558 F4.2 [Sun] del[C/H]t [0.01/0.04] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [C/H]
1560- 1563 F4.2 [Sun] e_del[C/H] [0.01/0.05] Uncertainty in del[C/H] (2)
1565- 1569 F5.2 [Sun] [C/H]A [-0.34/0.48] Component A nLBL method
[C/H]A
1571- 1574 F4.2 [Sun] [C/H]Al [0.01/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [C/H]A
1576- 1579 F4.2 [Sun] [C/H]At [0.01/0.11] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [C/H]A
1581- 1584 F4.2 [Sun] e_[C/H]A [0.02/0.11] Uncertainty in [C/H]A
1586- 1590 F5.2 [Sun] [C/H]B [-0.3/0.35] Component B nLBL method
[C/H]B
1592- 1595 F4.2 [Sun] [C/H]Bl [0.01/0.03] Statistical line-to-line
scatter in [C/H]B
1597- 1600 F4.2 [Sun] [C/H]Bt [0.01/0.08] Error from differential
stellar parameters in [C/H]B
1602- 1605 F4.2 [Sun] e_[C/H]B [0.02/0.08] Uncertainty in [C/H]B
1607- 1610 A4 --- ID Internal comoving pair identifier
1612- 1616 A5 --- delRV Different radial velocity in Gaia EDR3?
True|False
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): By definition, the differential analysis only applies to the
differences of the two components, and there will be no individual
values with the differential method.
Note (2): Total errors are added in quadrature.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: refs.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 19 A19 --- Ref Reference code
21- 39 A19 --- BibCode Bibcode of the reference if any
41- 64 A24 --- Auth Author
66-212 A147 --- Comm Comment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
From electronic version of the journal
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 22-Feb-2023