J/A+A/654/A56       Largest main belt asteroids data           (Vernazza+, 2021)

VLT/SPHERE imaging survey of the largest main belt asteroids: Final results and synthesis. Vernazza P., Ferrais M., Jorda L., Hanua J., Carry B., Marsset M., Broz M., Fetick R., Viikinkoski M., Marchis F., Vachier F., Drouard A., Fusco T., Birlan M., Podlewska-Gaca E., Rambaux N., Neveu M., Bartczak P., Dudzinski G., Jehin E., Beck P., Berthier J., Castillo-Rogez J., Cipriani F., Colas F., Dumas C., Durech J., Grice J., Kaasalainen M., Kryszczynska A., Lamy P., Le Coroller H., Marciniak A., Michalowski T., Michel P., Santana-Ros T., Tanga P., Vigan A., Witasse O., Yang B., Antonini P., Audejean M., Aurard P., Behrend R., Benkhaldoun Z., Bosch J.M., Chapman A., Dalmon L., Fauvaud S., Hamanowa Hiroko, Hamanowa Hiromi, His J., Jones A., Kim D-H., Kim M-J., Krajewski J., Labrevoir O., Leroy A., Livet F., Molina D., Montaigut R., Oey J., Payre N., Reddy V., Sabin P., Sanchez A.G., Socha L. <Astron. Astrophys. 654, A56 (2021)> =2021A&A...654A..56V 2021A&A...654A..56V (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Minor planets Keywords: minor planets, asteroids: general - methods: observational - techniques: high angular resolution Abstract: Until recently, the 3D shape, and therefore density (when combining the volume estimate with available mass estimates), and surface topography of the vast majority of the largest (D≥100km) main-belt asteroids have remained poorly constrained. The improved capabilities of the SPHERE/ZIMPOL instrument have opened new doors into ground-based asteroid exploration. To constrain the formation and evolution of a representative sample of large asteroids, we conducted a high-angular-resolution imaging survey of 42 large main-belt asteroids with VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL. Our asteroid sample comprises 39 bodies with D≥100km and in particular most D≥200km main-belt asteroids (20/23). Furthermore, it nicely reflects the compositional diversity present in the main belt as the sampled bodies belong to the following taxonomic classes: A, B, C, Ch/Cgh, E/M/X, K, P/T, S, and V. The SPHERE/ZIMPOL images were first used to reconstruct the 3D shape of all targets with both the ADAM and MPCD reconstruction methods. We subsequently performed a detailed shape analysis and constrained the density of each target using available mass estimates including our own mass estimates in the case of multiple systems. The analysis of the reconstructed shapes allowed us to identify two families of objects as a function of their diameters, namely "spherical" and "elongated" bodies. A difference in rotation period appears to be the main origin of this bimodality. In addition, all but one object (216 Kleopatra) are located along the Maclaurin sequence with large volatile-rich bodies being the closest to the latter. Our results further reveal that the primaries of most multiple systems possess a rotation period of shorter than 6h and an elongated shape (c/a≤0.65). Densities in our sample range from ∼1.3g/cm3 (87 Sylvia) to ∼4.3g/cm3 (22 Kalliope). Furthermore, the density distribution appears to be strongly bimodal with volatile poor (ρ≥2.7g/cm3) and volatile-rich (ρ≥2.2g/cm3) bodies. Finally, our survey along with previous observations provides evidence in support of the possibility that some C-complex bodies could be intrinsically related to IDP-like P- and D-type asteroids, representing different layers of a same body (C: core; P/D: outer shell). We therefore propose that P/ D-types and some C-types may have the same origin in the primordial trans-Neptunian disk. Description: The baseline observational strategy adopted for our large programme has been to image each target with SPHERE/ZIMPOL (i) around opposition to ensure an optimal spatial resolution (we restricted the observing period so that its angular diameter remained greater than at least 85% of that at opposition), (ii) every ∼60° in rotation phase in order to obtain a satisfactory surface coverage, and (iii) with seeing conditions of better than 0.8" and an airmass of below 1.6 in order to ensure great observing conditions and thus high-quality data. To fulfil these criteria and given that large programmes have the highest priority at ESO, we performed our large programme entirely in service mode. We would like to stress that this strategy has been key to the success of our programme. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 80 42 Taxonomic type, volume-equivalent diameter (D), mass (m), density (), geometric albedo, and c/a ratio of our large programme targets tablea2.dat 66 961 VLT/SPHERE disk-resolved images obtained by the ZIMPOL camera tablea3.dat 155 1184 *Optical disk-integrated data used for the shape modeling -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note on tablea3.dat: We only list light curves that have not been published or that have not been a subject of a shape modeling study (i.e., light curves are not available in DAMIT). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 3 I3 --- Num Asteroid number 5- 14 A10 --- Name Asteroid name 16 A1 --- n_Name [*] * for bodies visited by spacecraft 18- 21 A4 -- Class Taxonomic type 23- 25 A3 --- F/S [F/S ] Collisional family (F) or that possess one or two satellites (S) 27- 31 F5.1 km D Volume-equivalent diameter 33- 36 F4.1 km e_D Volume-equivalent diameter error (1 σ) 38- 43 F6.2 10+18kg m Mass 44- 48 F5.2 10+18kg e_m Mass error (1 σ) 50- 54 F5.3 g/cm3 rho Density 56- 60 F5.3 g/cm3 e_rho Density error (1 σ) 62- 66 F5.3 --- Albedo Albedo 68- 73 F6.4 --- c/a Oblateness 75- 80 F6.4 --- e_c/a Oblateness error (1 σ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 A1 --- --- [(] 2- 4 I3 --- Num Asteroid number 5 A1 --- --- [)] 7- 16 A10 --- Name Asteroid name 18- 27 A10 "date" Obs.Date Observation date 29- 36 A8 "h:m:s" Obs.Time Observation time (UT) 38- 40 I3 s ExpTime Exposure time 42- 45 F4.2 --- Airmass Airmass 47- 50 F4.2 AU Delta Distance to the Earth 52- 55 F4.2 AU r Distance to the Sun 57- 60 F4.1 deg alpha Phase angle 62- 66 F5.3 arcsec Da Angular diameter of Kalliope as seen from the Earth -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea3.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 A1 --- --- [(] 2- 4 I3 --- Num Asteroid number 5 A1 --- --- [)] 7- 16 A10 --- Name Asteroid name 18- 29 A12 "date" Epoch Epoch 32- 35 I4 --- Np Number of individual measurements 37- 40 F4.2 AU Delta Asteroid's distance to the Earth 42- 45 F4.2 AU r Asteroid's distance to the Sun 47- 50 F4.1 deg phi Phase angle 52- 53 A2 --- Filter Photometric filter 56-155 A100 --- Ref Reference or, for new data, either the observer, the telescope, or the campaign name instead of the reference (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): References as follows: GaiaGosa = Gaia-GOSA (Gaia-Ground-based Observational Service for Asteroids, www.gaiagosa.eu) SOAO = Sobaeksan Optical Astronomy Observatory Ahmad1954 = Ahmad, 1954ApJ...120..551A 1954ApJ...120..551A Burchi1985 = Burchi et al., 1985, A&AS, 60, 9 Chang1981 = Chang, et al., Chinese Astron. Astrophys., 5, 434 Debehogne1982 = Debehogne et al., 1982, A&AS, 50, 277 Debehogne1990 = Debehogne et al., in Asteroids, Comets, Meteors III, ed. C.I. Lagerkvist, H. Rickman, & B.A. Lindblad, 45 Denchev1998 = Denchev et al., 1998, Planet. Space Sci., 46, 673 DiMartino1984 = di Martino & Cacciatori, 1984, Icarus, 60, 75 Dotto1995 = Dotto et al., 1995, Icarus, 117, 313 Gehrels1962 = Gehrels & Owings, 1962ApJ...135..906G 1962ApJ...135..906G Grice2017 = Grice 2017, in Asteroids, Comets, and Meteors: ACM 2017 Hainaut1995a = Hainaut-Rouelle et al., 1995A&AS..112..125H 1995A&AS..112..125H, Cat. J/A+AS/112/125 Harris1989a = Harris & Young, 1989, Icarus, 81, 314 Hollis1988 = Hollis, 1988, Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 98, 351 Millis1987 = Millis et al., 1987, Icarus, 72, 507 Pilcher2010d = Pilcher, 2010, Minor Planet Bulletin, 37, 148 Podlewska2020 = Podlewska-Gaca et al., 2020A&A...638A..11P 2020A&A...638A..11P Reddy2015 = Reddy et al., 2015, Icarus, 260, 332 Scaltriti1980 = Scaltriti et al., 1980, Icarus, 43, 391 Schober1976 = Schober, 1976, Mitteilungen der Astronomischen Gesellschaft Hamburg, c40, 207 Schober1978 = Schober, 1978, A&AS, 34, 377 Stephens2009 = Stephens, 2009, Minor Planet Bulletin, 36, 59 Taylor1976 = Taylor et al., 1976, AJ, 81, 778 Tedesco1983b = Tedesco et al., 1983, Icarus, 54, 23 Warner2018b = Warner, 2018, Minor Planet Bulletin, 45, 256 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acknowledgements: Pierre Vernazza, pierre.vernazza(at)lam.fr
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 14-Sep-2021
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line