J/A+A/643/A2 ALPINE DR1 merged catalog (Bethermin+, 2020)
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey. Data processing, catalogs, and statistical
source properties.
Bethermin M., Fudamoto Y., Ginolfi M., Loiacono F., Khusanova Y.,
Capak P.L., Cassata P., Faisst A., Le Fevre O., Schaerer D.,
Silverman J.D., Yan L., Amorin R., Bardelli S., Boquien M., Cimatti A.,
Davidzon I., Dessauges-Zavadsky M., Fujimoto S., Gruppioni C., Hathi N.P.,
Ibar E., Jones G.C., Koekemoer A.M., Lagache G., Lemaux B.C., Moreau C.,
Oesch P.A., Pozzi F., Riechers D.A., Talia M., Toft S., Vallini L.,
Vergani D., Zamorani G., Zucca E.
<Astron. Astrophys. 643, A2 (2020)>
=2020A&A...643A...2B 2020A&A...643A...2B (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Surveys ; Interstellar medium ; Galaxy catalogs ; Redshifts ;
Millimetric/submm sources ; Ultraviolet
Keywords: galaxies: ISM - galaxies: star formation - galaxies: high-redshift -
submillimeter: galaxies
Abstract:
The ALPINE-ALMA large program targets the [CII] 158um line and the
far-infrared continuum in 118 spectroscopically confirmed star-forming
galaxies between z=4.4 and z=5.9. It represents the first large [CII]
statistical sample built in this redshift range. We present details of
the data processing and the construction of the catalogs. We detected
23 of our targets in the continuum. To derive accurate infrared
luminosities and obscured star formation rates, we measured the
conversion factor from the ALMA 158um rest-frame dust continuum
luminosity to the total infrared luminosity (LIR) after constraining
the dust spectral energy distribution by stacking a photometric sample
similar to ALPINE in ancillary single-dish far-infrared data. We found
that our continuum detections have a median LIR of
4.4x1011L☉. We also detected 57 additional continuum sources
in our ALMA pointings. They are at lower redshift than the ALPINE
targets, with a mean photometric redshift of 2.5±0.2. We measured
the 850um number counts between 0.35 and 3.5mJy, improving the current
interferometric constraints in this flux density range. We found a
slope break in the number counts around 3mJy with a shallower slope
below this value. More than 40% of the cosmic infrared background is
emitted by sources brighter than 0.35mJy. Finally, we detected the
[CII] line in 75 of our targets. Their median [CII] luminosity is
4.8x108L☉ and their median full width at half maximum is
252km/s. After measuring the mean obscured SFR in various [CII]
luminosity bins by stacking ALPINE continuum data, we find a good
agreement between our data and the local and predicted SFR-L[CII]
relations of De Looze et al. (2014A&A...568A..62D 2014A&A...568A..62D) and Lagache et al.
(2018A&A...609A.130L 2018A&A...609A.130L).
Description:
The ALPINE-ALMA large program (2017.1.00428.L, PI: Le Fevre) targeted
122 individual 4.4<zspec<5.9 and SFR≳10M☉/yr galaxies with
known spectroscopic redshifts from optical ground-based observations.
The construction and the physical properties of the sample is
described in Le Fevre et al. (2020A&A...343A...1L 2020A&A...343A...1L) and Faisst et al.
(020ApJS..247...61) respectively. The ALPINE sample contains sources
from both the cosmic evolution survey (COSMOS) field and the Chandra
deep field south (CDFS).
If you use this catalog, you should cite Bethermin et al.
(2020A&A...643A...2B 2020A&A...643A...2B) describing the ALMA data processing and catalogs
and the the additional papers if relevant:
- If ancillary data/properties from UV-to-near-IR are used:
Faisst et al. (2020ApJS..247...61F 2020ApJS..247...61F)
- If the morpho-kinematic classification is used:
Le Fevre et al. (2020A&A...643A...1L 2020A&A...643A...1L)
- If the ALMA sizes are used:
Fujimoto et al. (2020ApJ...900....1F 2020ApJ...900....1F)
The generic references for ALPINE is the following trio of papers: Le
Fevre et al. (2020A&A...643A...1L 2020A&A...643A...1L, survey design), Bethermin et al.
(2020A&A...643A...2B 2020A&A...643A...2B, ALMA data), and Faisst et al.
(2020A&A...643A...1L 2020A&A...643A...1L, ancillary data).
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
catalog.dat 777 118 ALPINE DR1 merged catalog
mergcat.fits 2880 31 fits version of ALPINE DR1 merged catalog
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: catalog.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 22 A22 --- Name ALPINE Unique name for each galaxy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data from Bethermin et al. (2020A&A...543A...2B 2020A&A...543A...2B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23 A1 --- l_FCII [<] Limit flag on FCII, if "<" FCII is
3-sigma secure upper limit if
non detection
24- 27 F4.2 Jy.km/s FCII CII line flux
29- 32 F4.2 Jy.km/s e_FCII ? 1-sigma uncertainty on the CII line
flux
34 A1 --- l_LCII [<] Limit flag on LCII, if "<" LCII is
3-sigma secure upper limit if
non detection
35- 45 E11.6 Lsun LCII CII luminosity
48- 58 E11.6 Lsun e_LCII ? 1-sigma uncertainty on LCII,
60- 65 F6.4 --- zCII ? CII redshift
67- 72 F6.4 --- e_zCII ? Uncertainties on the CII redshift
74- 76 I3 km/s CIIFWHM ? FWHM of the CII line
78- 79 I2 km/s e_CIIFWHM ? Uncertainty on CII_FWHM
81- 84 F4.1 --- SNRCII ? CII SNR measured in the mom-0 map
86 I1 --- f_CII [0/1] Flag indicating a complex [CII]
photometry (1)
87 A1 --- l_Scont [<] Limit flag on Scont, if "<" Scont is
3-sigma secure upper limit if
non detection
88- 91 F4.2 mJy Scont ∼155-um continuum flux
93- 96 F4.2 mJy e_Scont ? 1-sigma uncertainty on Scont
98 A1 --- l_L155 [<] Limit flag on L155, if "<" L155 is
3-sigma secure upper limit if
non detection
99-109 E11.6 Lsun L155 ∼155-um continuum monochromatic
luminosity (Lsun, nuLnu unit)
112-122 E11.6 Lsun e_L155 ? 1-sigma uncertainty on L155,
124 A1 --- l_LIR [<] Limit flag on LIR, if "<" LIR is
3-sigma secure upper limit if
non detection
125-135 E11.6 Lsun LIR Integrated 8-1000 micron luminosity
(Lsun, nuLnu unit)
138-148 E11.6 Lsun e_LIR ? 1-sigma uncertainty on LIR
(Lsun, nuLnu unit)
150-156 F7.2 GHz restFreq ? Effective rest-frame frequency at
which the continuum is measured
158-161 F4.1 --- SNRcont ? Peak SNR in the continuum map
163 I1 --- f_cont [0/1] flag indicating a complex
continuum photometry (1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data from Le Fevre et al. (2020A&A...643A...1L 2020A&A...643A...1L)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
165-166 I2 --- MkinClass [1/5]?=-1 Morpho kinematic class (2)
168-179 E12.6 kpc CIIsize CII size [kpc]
181-192 E12.6 kpc e_CIIsize 1-sigma uncertainty on the CII size
194-199 I6 --- f_CIIsize [0/1]?=999999 0 if reliable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data from Faisst al. (2020ApJS..247...61F 2020ApJS..247...61F)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
201-208 F8.4 deg RAdeg Right ascension (J2000) from either
the COSMOS or 3D-HST catalog
210-220 F11.6 mas dRA Constant shift (to be added to RA) in
R.A. due to astrometric offset (3)
222-230 F9.5 deg DEdeg Declination (J2000) from either the
COSMOS or 3D-HST catalog
232-242 F11.6 mas dDE Constant shift (to be added to DEC)
in decl. due to astrometric offset (3)
244 I1 --- Field [1/2] Field name,
1 = ECDFS or 2 = COSMOS
246-252 A7 -- Sel Selection Original selection (4)
254-259 F6.4 --- zorig Original redshift used for initial
selection (5)
261-268 F8.4 --- zCII2 ?=-99 Redshift determined from FIR [CII]
emission lines (see details in paper)
Is -99 if [CII] is not detected at
S/N>3.5
270-272 I3 --- Mclass ?=-99 Morpho-kinematic classes from
Le Fevre et al.
(2019, arXiv:1910.09517) (6)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data from Fujimoto et al. (2020ApJ...900....1F 2020ApJ...900....1F)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
274 I1 --- hastwin [0/1] A flag set to 1 of for a galaxy
has been observed by Keck/DEIMOS and
VUDS (two spectra available),
If false, the flag is set to 0
276-286 F11.6 --- zLya ?=-999 Redshift determined from peak of
Lyα emission (7)
288 A1 --- l_EWLya [<] Limit flag on EWLya
289-299 F11.5 --- EWLya Observer-frame Lyα emission
equivalent (7)
301-309 F9.5 --- e_EWLya []? 1σ uncertainty on
observer-frame Lyα emission
equivalent (8)
311-320 F10.5 mW/m2 FLya ?=-99 Lyα emission flux (7)
322-324 I3 --- f_specpro [1/3]?=-99 Visual flag for reliability
of absorption redshift measurements (9)
326-335 F10.6 --- ziswind ?=-99 Redshift determined from IS+wind
absorption lines (see Section 2.4)
337-346 F10.6 --- e_ziswind ?=-99 Error on ziswind
(lower value, 95% percentile)
348-357 F10.6 --- E_ziswind ?=-99 Error on ziswind
(upper value, 95% percentile)
359-361 I3 --- o_ziswind ?=-99 Number of lines used for IS+wind
redshift measurement (10)
363-372 F10.6 --- zwind ?=-99 Redshift determined from wind
absorption lines (see Section 2.4)
374-383 F10.6 --- e_zwind ?=-99 Error on zwind
(lower value, 95% percentile)
385-394 F10.6 --- E_zwind ?=-99 Error on zwind
(upper value, 95% percentile)
396-398 I3 --- o_zwind ?=-99 Number of lines used for wind
redshift measurement (11)
400-405 I6 --- IDphotcat ID in the photometric catalogs,
3D-HST catalog for galaxies in ECDFS
and the COSMOS2015 catalog for galaxies
in COSMOS
407-418 E12.6 --- chi2 chi2 value given by the LePhare fit
420-421 I2 --- Nband Number of bands used for SED fitting
423-432 F10.6 mag E(B-V) ?=-99 E(B-V) derived from SED fitting
434-442 F9.5 [yr] logAge ?=-99 Logarithmic age
444-452 F9.5 [yr] e_logAge ?=-99 Error on logAge (1sigma)
(lower value)
454-462 F9.5 [yr] E_logAge ?=-99 Error on logAge (1sigma)
(upper value)
464-472 F9.5 [Msun] logMstar ?=-99 Logarithmic stellar mass
474-482 F9.5 [Msun] e_logMstar ?=-99 Error on logMstar (1sigma)
(lower value)
484-492 F9.5 [Msun] E_logMstar ?=-99 Error on logMstar (1sigma)
(upper value)
494-503 F10.6 [Msun/yr] logSFRSED ?=-99 Logarithmic star formation rate
from SED
505-514 F10.6 [Msun/yr] e_logSFRSED ?=-99 Error on logSFRSED (1sigma)
(lower value)
516-525 F10.6 [Msun/yr] E_logSFRSED ?=-99 Error on logSFRSED (1sigma)
(upper value)
527-536 F10.6 [yr-1] logsSFR ?=-99 Logarithmic specific star
formation rate
538-547 F10.6 [yr-1] e_logsSFR []?=-99 Error on logsSFR (1sigma)
(lower value)
549-558 F10.6 [yr-1] E_logsSFR []?=-99 Error on logsSFR (1sigma)
(upper value)
560-566 F7.3 mag UVMAG ?=-99 Absolute rest-frame UV magnitude
measured in the GALEX FUV filter
(corresponding approximately to
rest-frame 1500Å
568-574 F7.3 mag e_UVMAG []?=-99 Error on UVMAG (1sigma)
(lower value)
576-582 F7.3 mag E_UVMAG []?=-99 Error on UVMAG (1sigma)
(upper value)
584-593 F10.6 [-] betamedC ?=-99 UV slope measured assuming
Calzetti (2000ApJ...533..682C 2000ApJ...533..682C) dust
595-604 F10.6 [-] e_betamedC []?=-99 Error on betamedcalz (1sigma)
(lower value)
606-615 F10.6 [-] E_betamedC []?=-99 Error on betamedcalz (1sigma)
(upper value)
617-626 F10.6 [-] betamedSMC ?=-99 UV slope measured assuming SMC
dust
628-637 F10.6 [-] e_betamedSMC []?=-99 Error on betamedsmc (1sigma)
(lower value)
639-648 F10.6 [-] E_betamedSMC []?=-99 Error on betamedsmc (1sigma)
(upper value)
650-659 F10.6 [-] betamedComb ?=-99 UV slope measured by marginalizing
over Calzetti (2000ApJ...533..682C 2000ApJ...533..682C)
and SMC dust
661-670 F10.6 [-] e_betamedComb []?=-99 Error on betamedcomb (1sigma)
(lower value)
672-681 F10.6 [-] E_betamedComb []?=-99 Error on betamedcomb (1sigma)
(upper value)
683 I1 --- Spitzer [0/2] Spitzer photometry contamination
flag (12)
685-694 F10.5 0.1nm EWHamed ?=-99 Rest-frame Hα equivalent
width assuming Calzetti et al.
(2000ApJ...533..682C 2000ApJ...533..682C) dust attenuation
and f=0.44
696-705 F10.5 0.1nm e_EWHamed ?=-99 Error on EWHamed (lower value)
707-717 F11.5 0.1nm E_EWHamed ?=-99 Error on eWHamed (upper value)
719-726 F8.4 [10-7W] logHaLummed ?=-99 Logarithmic Hα luminosity
assuming Calzetti et al.
(2000ApJ...533..682C 2000ApJ...533..682C) dust attenuation
and f=0.44
728-735 F8.4 [10-7W] e_logHaLummed ?=-99 Error on logHaLummed
(lower value)
737-744 F8.4 [10-7W] E_logHaLummed ?=-99 Error on logHaLummed
(upper value)
746-755 F10.6 --- logSFRHamed ?=-99 Logarithmic star formation rate
based on Hα luminosity (13)
757-766 F10.6 --- e_logSFRHamed []?=-99 Error on logSFRHamed
(lower value)
768-777 F10.6 --- E_logSFRHamed []?=-99 Error on logSFRHamed
(upper value)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): see Appendix of Bethermin et al. 2020A&A...643A...2B 2020A&A...643A...2B
Note (2): Morpho kinematic class as described in Le Fevre et al.
(2020A&A...643A...1L 2020A&A...643A...1L) as follows:
1 = Rotator
2 = Pair-merger
3 = Extended dispersion-dominated
4 = Compact Dispersion-dominated
5 = Too faint to be classified)
Note (3): see Section 3.3 of Faisst al., 2020ApJS..247...61F 2020ApJS..247...61F.
Note (4): For galaxies in the ECDFS field, this can be vlt or grapes.
For galaxies in COSMOS, possible selections are CHANDRA, LBG, NB1a, NB2a,
excess, photz, or vuds.
Note (5): (this redshift is derived from Lyα or absorption lines)
Note (6): Only for galaxies with >3.5σ [CII] detection (else class
set to -99).
The classes are as follows:
1 = rotator
2 = pair-merger (major or minor)
3 = extended dispersion-dominated
4 = compact dispersion-dominated
5 = too weak for assigning a class.
Note (7): see details in Cassata et al., 2020A&A...643A...6C 2020A&A...643A...6C
Note (8): see details in Cassata et al., 2020A&A...643A...6C 2020A&A...643A...6C
Is -99 if no equivalent width is measured and
-1 if no continuum measured (i.e., EW is upper limit).
Note (9): Visual flag for reliability of absorption redshift measurements
as follows (set to -99 if not attempted):
1 = least robust
2 = medium robust
3 = most robust
Note (10): We advise to generally only use galaxies with a value >2 together
with f_specpro >0 for a conservative sample selection.
Note (11): We advice to generally only use galaxies with a value >0 together
with f_specpro >0 for a conservative sample selection.
Note (12): Spitzer photometry contamination flag as follows:
0 = no contamination
1 = slight contamination
2 = heavy contamination
Note (13): Derived assuming (Kennicutt, 1998ARA&A..36..189K 1998ARA&A..36..189K) (solar
metallicity), Calzetti et al. (2000ApJ...533..682C 2000ApJ...533..682C) dust attenuation,
and f=0.44.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acknowledgements:
Mathieu Bethermin, matthieu.bethermin(at)lam.fr
References:
Faisst et al., 2020ApJS..247...61F 2020ApJS..247...61F,
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: Multiwavelength ancillary data and basic
physical measurements
Le Fevre et al. 2020A&A...643A...1L 2020A&A...643A...1L, arXiv:1910.09517,
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey. Survey strategy, observations, and sample
properties of 118 star-forming galaxies at 4<z<6
Fujimoto et al. 2020ApJ...900....1F 2020ApJ...900....1F, arXiv:2003.00013
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: Size of individual star-forming galaxies
at z=4-6 and their extended halo structure
Schaerer et al., 2020A&A...643A...3S 2020A&A...643A...3S
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey. Little to no evolution in the [CII]-SFR
relation over the last 13 Gyr
Fudamoto et al., 2020A&A...643A...4F 2020A&A...643A...4F
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: Dust attenuation properties and obscured
star formation at z∼4.4-5.8
Dessauges-Zavadsky et al., 2020A&A...643A...5D 2020A&A...643A...5D, arXiv:2004.10771,
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: Molecular gas budget in the Early Universe
as traced by [CII]
Cassata et al., 2020A&A...643A...6C 2020A&A...643A...6C
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey. Small Lyalpha-[CII] velocity offsets in
main-sequence galaxies at 4.4<z<6
Ginolfi et al., 2020A&A...643A...7G 2020A&A...643A...7G, arXiv:2004.13737,
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey. Circumgalactic medium pollution and gas
mixing by tidal stripping in a merging system at z∼4.57
Gruppioni et al., 2020A&A...643A...8G 2020A&A...643A...8G, arXiv:2006.04974,
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: nature, luminosity function and star
formation history of continuum non-target galaxies up to z∼6
Khusanova et al., 2020, A&A in press, arXiv:2007.08384,
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] Survey: Obscured star formation rate density and
main sequence of star-Forming galaxies at z>4
Loiacono et al., 2020, A&A in press, arXiv:2006.04837,
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: the luminosity function of serendipitous
[CII] line emitters at z∼5
Yan et al, 2020ApJ...905..147Y 2020ApJ...905..147Y, arXiv:2006.04835,
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: [CII]158micron emission line luminosity
functions at z∼4-6
Fudamoto et al., 2020, A&A in press, arXiv:2004.10760
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: Dust attenuation properties and obscured
star-formation at z∼4.4-5.8
Romano et al., 2020MNRAS.496..875R 2020MNRAS.496..875R, arXiv:2002.00961,
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: On the nature of an extremely obscured
serendipitous galaxy
Jones et al., 2020MNRAS.491L..18J 2020MNRAS.491L..18J, arXiv:1908.07777,
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: A triple merger at z∼4.56
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 14-Aug-2020