Access to Astronomical Catalogues

← Click to display the menu
J/MNRAS/460/2862   Stellar mass of brightest cluster galaxies (Bellstedt+, 2016)

The evolution in the stellar mass of brightest cluster galaxies over the past 10 billion years. Bellstedt S., Lidman C., Muzzin A., Franx M., Guatelli S., Hill A.R., Hoekstra H., Kurinsky N., Labbe I., Marchesini D., Marsan Z.C., Safavi-Naeini M., Sifon C., Stefanon M., van de Sande J., van Dokkum P., Weigel C. <Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 460, 2862-2874 (2016)> =2016MNRAS.460.2862B (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Clusters, galaxy ; Redshifts Keywords: galaxies: clusters: general - galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD - galaxies: evolution Abstract: Using a sample of 98 galaxy clusters recently imaged in the near-infrared with the European Southern Observatory (ESO) New Technology Telescope, WIYN telescope and William Herschel Telescope, supplemented with 33 clusters from the ESO archive, we measure how the stellar mass of the most massive galaxies in the universe, namely brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs), increases with time. Most of the BCGs in this new sample lie in the redshift range 0.2<z<0.6, which has been noted in recent works to mark an epoch over which the growth in the stellar mass of BCGs stalls. From this sample of 132 clusters, we create a subsample of 102 systems that includes only those clusters that have estimates of the cluster mass. We combine the BCGs in this subsample with BCGs from the literature, and find that the growth in stellar mass of BCGs from 10 billion years ago to the present epoch is broadly consistent with recent semi-analytic and semi-empirical models. As in other recent studies, tentative evidence indicates that the stellar mass growth rate of BCGs may be slowing in the past 3.5 billion years. Further work in collecting larger samples, and in better comparing observations with theory using mock images, is required if a more detailed comparison between the models and the data is to be made. Description: We utilize a sample of 98 newly imaged galaxy clusters from the RELICS (REd Lens Infrared Cluster Survey) survey within this study. The data were collected during six observing runs on three instruments over a period spanning from 2013 October to 2015 March. The instruments utilized were the SofI2 camera on the New Technology Telescope at the European Southern Observatory (ESO) La Silla Observatory in Chile, WHIRC3 on the WIYN telescope at the Kitt Peak National Observatory and LIRIS4 on the William Herschel Telescope (WHT) in La Palma, Spain. File Summary:
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
ReadMe 80 . This file table2.dat 87 155 Observational summary table5.dat 117 143 BCG results
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 23 A23 --- Cluster Cluster name 26- 27 I2 h RAh Right ascension (J2000) 29- 30 I2 min RAm Right ascension (J2000) 32- 36 F5.2 s RAs Right ascension (J2000) 38 A1 --- DE- Declination sign (J2000) 39- 40 I2 deg DEd Declination (J2000) 42- 43 I2 arcmin DEm Declination (J2000) 45- 49 F5.2 arcsec DEs Declination (J2000) 51- 56 F6.4 --- zsp ?=- Spectroscopic redshift 58- 62 F5.3 --- zph ?=- Photometric redshift 65- 69 A5 --- r_z Reference for redshift (G1) 71- 80 A10 --- Inst/Tel Instrument/Telescope 83- 87 I5 s ExpTime Exposure time
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 23 A23 --- Cluster Cluster name 24- 29 F6.4 --- zsp ?=- spectroscopic redshift 31- 35 F5.3 --- zph ?=- Photometric redshift 39- 43 A5 --- r_z Reference for redshift (G1) 44- 45 I2 h RAh Right ascension (J2000) 47- 48 I2 min RAm Right ascension (J2000) 50- 54 F5.2 s RAs Right ascension (J2000) 56 A1 --- DE- Declination sign (J2000) 57- 58 I2 deg DEd Declination (J2000) 60- 61 I2 arcmin DEm Declination (J2000) 63- 67 F5.2 arcsec DEs Declination (J2000) 69- 74 F6.3 mag KsmagB BCG Ks magnitude 76- 80 F5.3 mag e_KsmagB rms uncertainty on KsmagB (magnitude errors stated are those reported by SExtractor) 82- 86 F5.3 10+12Msun MBCG ?=- BCG mass (BCG masses are uncertain by ∼20 per cent) 88- 91 F4.2 10+15Msun MCluster ?=- Cluster mass (all cluster masses are measured to M200) 93- 96 F4.2 10+15Msun e_MCluster ? rms uncertainty on MCluster 98-114 A17 --- proxy Cluster mass proxy 116-117 I2 --- r_proxy ? References for cluster mass proxy (2)
Note (2): Cluster mass proxy sources as follows: 1 = Mann & Ebeling (2012MNRAS.420.2120M) 2 = Mantz et al. (2010MNRAS.407.1773C) 3 = Menanteau et al. (2013ApJ...765...67M) 4 = Ebeling et al. (2007ApJ...661L..33E) 5 = Menanteau et al. (2010ApJ...723.1523M) 6 = Mahdavi et al. (2013ApJ...767..116M) 7 = Piffaretti et al. (2011, Cat. J/A+A/534/A109) 8 = Henry et al. (11992ApJ...386..408H) 9 = Ebeling et al. (1998MNRAS.301..881E) 10 = Maughan et al. (2012MNRAS.421.1583M) 11 = Benson et al. (2013ApJ...763..147B) 12 = Buddendiek et al. (2015MNRAS.450.4248B) 13 = Hasselfield et al. (2013, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 07, 008) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Global notes Note (G1): Redshift sources as follows: 1 = Mantz et al. (2010MNRAS.407.1773C) 2 = Mann & Ebeling (2012MNRAS.420.2120M) 3 = Menanteau et al. (2013ApJ...765...67M) 4 = Kristian, Sandage & Westphal (1978ApJ...221..383K) 5 = Gioia et al. (1998ApJ...497..573G) 6 = Ebeling et al. (2007ApJ...661L..33E) 7 = Abell, Corwin & Olowin (1989ApJ....70....1A) 8 = SDSS, DR8 9 = Menanteau et al. (2010ApJ...723.1523M) 10 = Werner et al. (2007A&A...474..707W) 11 = Jones et al. (2009MNRAS.399..683J, Cat. VII/259) 12 = NASA Astrophysical Database 13 = van Weeren et al. (2012MNRAS.425L..36V) 14 = Williamson et al. (2011ApJ...738..139W) 15 = Story et al. (2011ApJ...735L..36S) 16 = Aganim et al. (2012A&A...543A.102P) 17 = Sifon et al. (2013, Cat. J/ApJ/772/25) 18 = Ebeling et al. (2010MNRAS.407...83E) 19 = Applegate et al. (2014MNRAS.439...48A) 20 = Ruel et al. (2014, Cat. J/ApJ/792/45) 21 = Buddendiek et al. (2015MNRAS.450.4248B) 22 = Wen & Han (2013, Cat. J/MNRAS/436/275) 23 = Piffaretti et al. (2011, Cat. J/A+A/534/A109) 24 = Vanderlinde et al. (2010ApJ...722.1180V) 25 = von der Linden et al. (2014MNRAS.439....2V) 26 = Sifon et al. (2013, Cat. J/ApJ/772/25) 27 = Brodwin et al. (2010ApJ...721...90B)
History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 22-Nov-2017
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues.From this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line

catalogue service