Access to Astronomical Catalogues

← Click to display the menu
J/ApJS/233/17  Swift/BAT AGN spectroscopic survey. V. X-ray data  (Ricci+, 2017)

BAT AGN spectroscopic survey. V. X-ray properties of the Swift/BAT 70-month AGN catalog. Ricci C., Trakhtenbrot B., Koss M.J., Ueda Y., Del Vecchio I., Treister E., Schawinski K., Paltani S., Oh K., Lamperti I., Berney S., Gandhi P., Ichikawa K., Bauer F.E., Ho L.C., Asmus D., Beckmann V., Soldi S., Balokovic M., Gehrels N., Markwardt C.B. <Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 233, 17-17 (2017)> =2017ApJS..233...17R (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Gamma rays ; X-ray sources ; Active gal. nuclei ; BL Lac objects ; Redshifts Keywords: galaxies: active; galaxies: Seyfert; quasars: general X-rays: diffuse background; X-rays: general Abstract: Hard X-ray (≥10keV) observations of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) can shed light on some of the most obscured episodes of accretion onto supermassive black holes. The 70-month Swift/BAT all-sky survey, which probes the 14-195keV energy range, has currently detected 838 AGNs. We report here on the broadband X-ray (0.3-150keV) characteristics of these AGNs, obtained by combining XMM-Newton, Swift/XRT, ASCA, Chandra, and Suzaku observations in the soft X-ray band (≤10keV) with 70-month averaged Swift/BAT data. The nonblazar AGNs of our sample are almost equally divided into unobscured (NH<1022cm-2) and obscured (NH≥1022cm-2) AGNs, and their Swift/BAT continuum is systematically steeper than the 0.3-10keV emission, which suggests that the presence of a high-energy cutoff is almost ubiquitous. We discuss the main X-ray spectral parameters obtained, such as the photon index, the reflection parameter, the energy of the cutoff, neutral and ionized absorbers, and the soft excess for both obscured and unobscured AGNs. Description: Our sample consists of the 838 AGNs detected within the 70-month Swift/BAT catalog (Baumgartner+, 2013, J/ApJS/207/19). The spectral analysis was carried out combining the 70-month time-averaged Swift/BAT spectra with data obtained by several X-ray facilities: ASCA (Section 3.1), Chandra (Section 3.2), Suzaku (Section 3.3), Swift/XRT (Section 3.4), and XMM-Newton (Section 3.5). Only two AGNs (SWIFT J1119.5+5132 and SWIFT J1313.6+3650A) were not observed by any X-ray facility in the 0.3-10keV range. Details of the soft X-ray observation used for the broadband X-ray spectral analysis of each source are reported in Table 2. File Summary:
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 99 838 List of the Swift/BAT AGN from the 70-month catalog table2.dat 84 838 Log of the soft X-ray observations table5.dat 210 836 Parameters obtained by the analysis of the broad-band X-ray spectra table6.dat 58 26 Parameters of the broken power-law continuum table7.dat 82 99 Parameters of the warm absorbers table8.dat 96 309 Parameters of the Gaussian lines table9.dat 147 75 Spectral parameters obtained with the torus model table12.dat 60 836 X-ray fluxes of the sources of our sample table13.dat 55 801 X-ray luminosities of the sources of our sample table14.dat 31 56 Intrinsic 2-10keV fluxes and luminosities for Compton-thick (CT, log(NH/cm-2)≥24) AGN table15.dat 78 836 Values of Gamma-nEc and Gamma-0310
See also: VIII/76 : Leiden/Argentine/Bonn (LAB) Survey of Galactic HI (Kalberla+ 2005) VII/233 : The 2MASS Extended sources (IPAC/UMass, 2003-2006) VII/274 : The Roma BZCAT - 5th edition (Massaro+, 2015) J/A+A/418/465 : Mid-infrared and hard X-ray emission in AGN (Lutz+, 2004) J/ApJ/633/L77 : SWIFT/BAT detections of AGN (Markwardt+, 2005) J/ApJ/663/81 : SED of hard X-ray selected AGN in XMDS (Polletta+, 2007) J/ApJ/673/96 : BAT X-ray Survey - III (Ajello+, 2008) J/A+A/487/119 : AGN in XMM-Newton Hard Bright Survey (Della Ceca+, 2008) J/ApJ/681/113 : Swift BAT survey of AGNs (Tueller+, 2008) J/ApJ/699/603 : Evolution of Swift/BAT blazars (Ajello+, 2009) J/A+A/505/417 : Second INTEGRAL AGN catalogue (Beckmann+, 2009) J/MNRAS/397/1177 : Swift-XRT observations of GRBs (Evans+, 2009) J/A+A/495/691 : Multifreq. catalogue of blazars, Roma-BZCAT (Massaro+, 2009) J/A+A/510/A48 : Palermo Swift-BAT Hard X-ray Catalogue (Cusumano+, 2010) J/A+A/524/A64 : The 54-month Palermo BAT-survey catalogue (Cusumano+, 2010) J/ApJS/186/378 : Hard X-ray survey from Swift-BAT 2004-2006 (Tueller+, 2010) J/MNRAS/413/1206 : XMM survey of 12um selected galaxies (Brightman+, 2011) J/ApJ/728/58 : Swift-BAT survey of AGNs (Burlon+, 2011) J/A+A/530/A42 : X-ray properties of AGNs in XBS (Corral+, 2011) J/ApJ/739/57 : Ultra hard X-ray AGNs in the Swift/BAT survey (Koss+, 2011) J/ApJ/742/61 : Phot. redshift of AGNs from XMM- & C-COSMOS (Salvato+ 2011) J/ApJ/742/66 : New Fermi/LAT extragalactic sources (Teng+, 2011) J/ApJ/749/21 : AGNs detected by 60 month Swift/BAT survey (Ajello+, 2012) J/ApJ/754/45 : IR properties of Swift/BAT X-ray AGNs (Ichikawa+, 2012) J/ApJ/746/L22 : Dual AGNs in the nearby Universe (Koss+, 2012) J/MNRAS/426/1750 : INTEGRAL/IBIS AGN catalogue (Malizia+, 2012) J/A+A/545/A101 : Spectra of 29 Swift/BAT optical counterparts (Parisi+, 2012) J/MNRAS/426/2522 : FeK lines in Seyfert 1 galaxies (Patrick+, 2012) J/ApJS/207/19 : X-ray survey from Swift-BAT 2004-2010 (Baumgartner+, 2013) J/MNRAS/430/60 : Suzaku view of ionized outflows in AGN (Gofford+, 2013) J/ApJ/765/L26 : Swift/BAT hard X-ray data from GOALS LIRGs (Koss+, 2013) J/ApJS/209/14 : The Swift/BAT hard X-ray transient monitor (Krimm+, 2013) J/ApJS/206/17 : New gamma-ray blazar candidates in the 3PBC (Maselli+, 2013) J/ApJ/763/111 : X-ray spectral analysis of Swift/BAT AGNs (Vasudevan+, 2013) J/ApJ/794/152 : PACS observations of Herschel-BAT sample (Melendez+, 2014) J/A+A/561/A67 : Spectra of 75 Swift/BAT optical counterparts (Parisi, 2014) J/A+A/563/A57 : Long-term variability of AGN at hard X-rays (Soldi+, 2014) J/ApJ/815/L13 : Compton-thick AGNs from 70mth Swift/BAT cat. (Ricci+, 2015) J/ApJ/807/129 : X-ray to MIR luminosities relation of AGNs (Stern, 2015) J/A+A/588/A70 : Hard X-ray view of the soft excess in AGN (Boissay+, 2016) J/MNRAS/460/19 : Update of INTEGRAL/IBIS AGN catalogue (Malizia+, 2016) J/MNRAS/456/3335 : SPIRE observations of Herschel-BAT sample (Shimizu+, 2016) J/ApJ/835/74 : IR phot. of AGNs in Swift/BAT 70mth cat. (Ichikawa+, 2017) J/ApJ/836/99 : NuSTAR serendipitous survey: 40-month (Lansbury+, 2017) J/ApJ/835/223 : A catalog of nearby galaxies with Chandra obs. (She+, 2017) J/ApJ/850/74 : Swift/BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey. I. (Koss+, 2017) http://swift.gsfc.nasa.gov/results/bs70mon/ : Swift BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey online catalog Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT] 6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN) 21 A1 --- DZ [ab] Distance identifier (2) 23- 47 A25 --- OName Counterpart source name 49- 57 F9.5 deg RAdeg Right Ascension, decimal degrees (J2000) 59- 67 F9.5 deg DEdeg Declination, decimal degrees (J2000) 69- 75 F7.5 --- z [0.0001/3.7]? Redshift of the counterpart (3) 77- 81 F5.3 --- b_zphot [0.002/0.7]? Lower boundary of the photometric redshift (4) 83- 87 F5.3 --- B_zphot [0.003/0.9]? Upper boundary of the photometric redshift (4) 89- 95 F7.1 Mpc Dist [3.7/32342]? Distance of the source (5) 97- 99 A3 --- BZ Blazar flag (6)
Note (2): Distance identifier as follows: a = sources with photometric redshifts (27 occurrences); b = sources with redshift-independent distances (43 occurrences). Note (3): Redshifts are spectroscopic unless DZ = a (photometric). Note (4): Bounds on the photometric redshifts are given when DZ = a. Note (5): For sources with DZ = b we report the redshift-independent distances. Note (6): We flagged all blazars in our sample according to the latest release (5.0.0; Massaro+ 2015, VII/274) of the Roma BZCAT catalog (Massaro+ 2009, J/A+A/495/691) and using the results of recent works on BAT-detected blazars (Ajello+ 2009, J/ApJ/699/603 ; Maselli+ 2013, J/ApJS/206/17). Flag as follows: BZB = BL Lacs (26 occurrences) BZQ = Flat Spectrum Radio Quasars (53 occurrences) BZU = blazars of uncertain type (26 occurrences)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT] 6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN) 21- 38 A18 --- XObs X-ray observatory used for the soft X-ray (0.3-10keV) spectrum 40- 49 A10 --- ObsID Observation ID 51- 55 F5.1 ks Exp1 [0.7/249]? Exposure of the observations carried out by Swift/XRT, XMM-Newton EPIC/PN, Chandra/ACIS, Suzakus front-illuminated cameras, and ASCA/SIS 57- 60 F4.1 ks Exp2 [21/34]? Exposure of the observations carried out by ASCA/GIS 62- 68 I7 ct Cts1 [3/2111120]? Number of counts of Swift/XRT, XMM-Newton EPIC/PN, Chandra/ACIS, Suzaku front-illuminated cameras, and ASCA/SIS0 70- 74 I5 ct Cts2 [566/82047]? Number of counts of Suzaku back-illuminated cameras and ASCA/SIS1 76- 79 I4 ct Cts3 [1250/7594]? Number of counts of ASCA/GIS2 81- 84 I4 ct Cts4 [1629/9334]? Number of counts of ASCA/GIS3
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT] 6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN) 21- 25 F5.2 [cm-2] logNH [19/25] Column density of the neutral obscuring material, in logarithm (1) 27- 31 F5.2 [cm-2] b_logNH Lower bound, 90% confidence interval for logNH 33- 37 F5.2 [cm-2] B_logNH Upper bound, 90% confidence interval for logNH 39 A1 --- f_logNH [f] Flag on logNH (G1) 41- 44 F4.2 --- Gamma [0.5/3.2] Photon index of the primary X-ray continuum 46- 49 F4.2 --- E_Gamma [0.01/2]? Upper error (90%) for Gamma 51- 54 F4.2 --- e_Gamma ? Lower error (90%) for Gamma 56 A1 --- f_Gamma [f] Flag on Gamma (G1) 58- 60 A3 --- l_Ecut [<≥ ] Limit flag for Ecut 62- 64 I3 keV Ecut [11/655]? Energy of the cutoff 66 A1 --- f_Ecut Flag on Ecut (G1) 68- 70 I3 keV E_Ecut [5/492]? Upper error (90%) for Ecut 72- 74 I3 keV e_Ecut ? Lower error (90%) for Ecut 76- 78 A3 --- l_R [<≥ ] Limit flag for R 80- 84 F5.2 --- R [0.01/26]? Reflection parameter 86 A1 --- f_R [f] Flag on R (G1) 88- 92 F5.2 --- E_R [0.02/14]? Upper error (90%) for R 94- 97 F4.2 --- e_R ? Lower error (90%) for R 99-103 F5.2 --- CBAT [0.2/27] Cross-calibration constant 105 A1 --- f_CBAT [f] Flag on CBAT (G1) 107-111 F5.2 --- E_CBAT [0.02/39]? Upper error (90%) for CBAT 113-117 F5.2 --- e_CBAT ? Lower error (90%) for CBAT 119-121 A3 --- l_fscatt [≤ ] Upper limit flag on fscatt 123-127 F5.2 % fscatt [0.01/80]? Fraction of scattered radiation 129-133 F5.2 % E_fscatt [0.03/52]? Upper error (90%) fscatt 135-139 F5.2 % e_fscatt ? Lower error (90%) fscatt 141-145 F5.3 keV Temp [0.02/4.1]? Temperature of the blackbody or thermal plasma component (2) 147-151 F5.3 keV E_Temp [0.001/1.2]? Upper error (90%) for Temp (2) 153-157 F5.3 keV e_Temp ? Lower error (90%) for Temp (2) 159-162 F4.2 keV Temp2 [0.07/9]? Temperature of the second thermal plasma component 164-167 F4.2 keV E_Temp2 [0.01/1]? Upper error (90%) for Temp2 169-172 F4.2 keV e_Temp2 ? Lower error (90%) for Temp2 174-177 F4.2 keV Temp3 [0.83]? Temperature of the third thermal plasma component 179-182 F4.2 keV E_Temp3 [0.02]? Upper error (90%) for Temp3 184-187 F4.2 keV e_Temp3 [0.02]? Lower error (90%) for Temp3 189-190 A2 --- Model Spectral model used for the spectral fitting (see table 4) 192 A1 --- f_Model [G] Flag for the model (3) 194-200 F7.2 --- Stat [4/3526] Value of the statistic 202-205 I4 --- DOF [7/3354] Number of degrees of freedom 207-210 A4 --- f_Stat Statistic used (4)
Note (1): Sources with logNH=20.00 are completely unobscured. Note (2): Temperature of the blackbody component (for unobscured objects) or of the thermal plasma component (for obscured objects). Note (3): Flag for the model: G = a Gaussian line was added to the model Note (4): Statistic used as follows: chi2 = chi-squared; C = Cash statistic
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table6.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT] 6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMA) 21- 25 F5.2 --- Gamma2 [-2.2/3.6] Value of the second photon index of the broken power law (1) 27- 30 F4.2 --- E_Gamma2 [0.02/2.2] Upper error (90%) for Gamma2 32- 35 F4.2 --- e_Gamma2 Lower error (90%) for Gamma2 37- 39 A3 --- l_Ebkn [≤ ] Upper limit flag for Ebkn 41- 45 F5.2 keV Ebkn [1.4/88] Energy of the break (1) 47- 51 F5.2 keV E_Ebkn [0.02/32]? Upper error (90%) for Ebkn 53- 58 F6.2 keV e_Ebkn ? Lower error (90%) for Ebkn
Note (1): For SWIFTJ1256.2-0551 two sets of values are reported since the source was fitted using model C8, which considers a double broken power-law. For this object the second line reports the value of Gamma2 and E2bkn.
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table7.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT] 6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMA) 21- 26 F6.2 10+22cm-2 NHw [0.1/181] Column density of the warm absorbers 28- 33 F6.2 10+22cm-2 E_NHw [0.02/163] Upper error (90%) for NHw 35- 39 F5.2 10+22cm-2 e_NHw Lower error (90%) for NHw 41- 43 A3 --- l_logXi [≤ ] Upper limit flag for logXi 45- 49 F5.2 [10-9W.m] logXi [-2/72]? Log of ionization parameter, erg*cm/s 51- 54 F4.2 [10-9W.m] E_logXi ? Upper error (90%) for logXi 56- 60 F5.2 [10-9W.m] e_logXi [0.02/33]? Lower error (90%) for logXi 62- 64 A3 --- l_fwcov [<≥ ] Limit flag for fwcov 66- 69 F4.1 % fwcov [1.6/100]? Covering factor of the warm absorber 71- 75 F5.2 % E_fwcov ? Upper error (90%) for fwcov 77- 82 F6.2 % e_fwcov [0.1/38]? Lower error (90%) for fwcov
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table8.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT] 6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN) 21- 25 F5.3 keV Ekalpha [5.4/7.7]? Energy of the Kalpha line 27- 31 F5.3 keV e_Ekalpha [0.002/2]? Lower error (90%) for Ekalpha 33- 37 F5.3 keV E_Ekalpha ? Upper error (90%) for Ekalpha 39 A1 --- f_Ekalpha Flag for EKalpha (G1) 41- 43 A3 --- l_EW [<≥ ] Limit flag for EW 45- 48 I4 eV EW [9/7300]? Equivalent width of the Kalpha line 50- 53 I4 eV E_EW ? Upper error (90%) for EW 55- 58 I4 eV e_EW [2/5641]? Lower error (90%) for EW 60- 62 I3 eV sigma [12/237]? Width of the line 64- 66 I3 eV E_sigma [4/258]? Upper error (90%) for sigma 68- 70 I3 eV e_sigma ? Lower error (90%) for sigma 72- 74 A3 --- l_nKalpha [≤ ] Limit flag for nKalpha 76- 81 F6.2 10-6ph/cm2/s nKalpha [0.07/587]? Normalization of the Kalpha line, 1e-6photons/cm2/s 83- 88 F6.2 10-6ph/cm2/s e_nKalpha [0.03/303]? Lower error (90%) for nKalpha 90- 96 F7.2 10-6ph/cm2/s E_nKalpha ? Upper error (90%) for nKalpha
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table9.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT] 6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMA) 21- 23 A3 --- l_thetaOA [<≥ ] Limit flag for thetaOA 25- 26 I2 deg thetaOA [31/82] Half-opening angle of the torus 28- 29 I2 deg E_thetaOA ? Upper error (90%) for thetaOA 31- 32 I2 deg e_thetaOA [2/25]? Lower error (90%) for thetaOA 34 A1 --- f_thetaOA [f] Flag on thetaOA (G1) 36- 40 F5.2 [cm-2] logNH-tor [23.3/25.6] Log of the column density of the neutral obscuring material obtained with the torus model 42- 46 F5.2 [cm-2] b_logNH-tor [22.9/25.1] Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval for logNH-tor 48- 52 F5.2 [cm-2] B_logNH-tor [23.4/26] Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for logNH-tor (1) 54- 57 F4.2 --- Gamma-tor [1.2/3] Photon index of the primary X-ray continuum obtained with the torus model 59- 62 F4.2 --- E_Gamma-tor Upper error (90%) for Gamma-tor 64- 67 F4.2 --- e_Gamma-tor [0.01/1] Lower error (90%) for Gamma-tor 69- 71 A3 --- l_fscatt-tor [≤ ] Upper limit Flag for Gamma-tor 73- 77 F5.2 % fscatt-tor [0.01/18.3]? Fraction of scattered radiation obtained with the torus model 79- 83 F5.2 % E_fscatt-tor [0.01/20]? Upper error (90%) for fscatt-tor 85- 88 F4.2 % e_fscatt-tor ? Lower error (90%) for fscatt-tor 90- 93 F4.2 keV Temp-tor [0.03/1.3]? Temperature of the thermal plasma component obtained with the torus model 95- 98 F4.2 keV E_Temp-tor [0.01/8]? Upper error (90%) for Temp-tor 100-103 F4.2 keV e_Temp-tor ? Lower error (90%) for Temp-tor 105-108 F4.2 keV Temp2-tor [0.6/1.1]? Temperature of the second thermal plasma component obtained with the torus model 110-113 F4.2 keV E_Temp2-tor [0.03/0.4]? Upper error (90%) for Temp2-tor 115-118 F4.2 keV e_Temp2-tor ? Lower error (90%) for Temp2-tor 120-123 F4.2 --- CBAT-tor [0.3/8]? Cross-calibration constant obtained with the torus model 125-128 F4.2 --- E_CBAT-tor [0.08/9]? Upper error (90%) for CBAT-tor 130-133 F4.2 --- e_CBAT-tor ? Lower error (90%) for CBAT-tor 135 A1 --- f_CBAT-tor [f] Flag for CBAT-tor (G1) 137-142 F6.1 --- Stat-tor [6/1958] Value of the statistic obtained with the torus model 144-147 I4 --- DOF-tor [12/1463] Number of degrees of freedom for the torus model
Note (1): Entries with upper bounds of "26.00" should be considered as lower limits.
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table12.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT] 6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN) 21- 26 F6.1 10-12mW/m2 F2-10obs [0.1/1283] Observed flux in the 2-10keV range, in units of 1e-12erg/cm2/s 28- 33 F6.1 10-12mW/m2 F14-195obs [3/1389] Observed flux in the 14-195keV range, in units of 1e-12erg/cm2/s 35- 40 F6.1 10-12mW/m2 F2-10int [0.2/1280] Intrinsic flux in the 2-10keV range, in units of 1e-12erg/cm2/s 42- 46 F5.1 10-12mW/m2 F20-50int [1/522] Intrinsic flux in the 20-50keV range, in units of 1e-12erg/cm2/s 48- 53 F6.1 10-12mW/m2 F14-150int [2.9/1471] Intrinsic flux in the 14-150keV range, in units of 1e-12erg/cm2/s 55- 60 F6.1 10-12mW/m2 F14-195int [3/1681] Intrinsic flux in the 14-195keV range, in units of 1e-12 erg/cm2/s
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table13.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT] 6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN) 21- 25 F5.2 [10-7W] logL2-10obs [38.3/47.6] Observed log of luminosity in the 2-10keV range, in units of erg/s 27- 31 F5.2 [10-7W] logL14-195obs [38.5/48.2] Observed log of luminosity in the 14-195keV range, in units of erg/s 33- 37 F5.2 [10-7W] logL2-10int [38.3/47.6] Intrinsic log of luminosity in the 2-10keV range, in units of erg/s 39- 43 F5.2 [10-7W] logL20-50int [38.1/47.6] Intrinsic log of luminosity in the 20-50keV range, in units of erg/s 45- 49 F5.2 [10-7W] logL14-150int [38.5/48.1] Intrinsic log of luminosity in the 14-150keV range, in units of erg/s 51- 55 F5.2 [10-7W] logL14-195int [38.5/48.2] Intrinsic log of luminosity in the 14-195keV range, in units of erg/s
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table14.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT] 6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN) 21- 25 F5.1 10-12mW/m2 F2-10 [4/624] Extrapolated intrinsic flux in the 2-10 keV range for the CT AGN, in units of 1e-12 erg/s/cm2 (2) 27- 31 F5.2 [10-7W] logL2-10 [41.6/44.9] Extrapolated lof of intrinsic luminosity in the 2-10keV range for the CT AGN, in units of erg/s (2)
Note (2): The intrinsic flux and luminosity in the 2-10keV range are extrapolated from the intrinsic 14-150keV flux or luminosity, respectively.
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table15.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT] 6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN) 21- 27 F7.5 --- Gamma-nEc [0.8/3.1]? Photon index fixing the energy of the cutoff to 500keV 29- 37 F9.7 --- e_Gamma-nEc ? Lower error (90%) for Gamma-nEc 39- 47 F9.7 --- E_Gamma-nEc [0.01/4.4]? Upper error (90%) for Gamma-nEc 49- 58 F10.7 --- Gamma-0310 [-1.5/4.2]? Photon index fixing the energy of the cutoff and removing the reflection component (2) 60- 68 F9.7 --- e_Gamma-0310 ? Lower error (90%) for Gamma-0310 (2) 70- 78 F9.7 --- E_Gamma-0310 [0.01/5.3]? Upper error (90%) for Gamma-0310 (2)
Note (2): Photon index obtained fixing the energy of the cutoff to 500keV, removing the reflection component and fitting in the 0.3-10keV range only.
Global notes: Note (G1): "f" for sources for which the value was fixed during the fitting.
History: From electronic version of the journal References: Koss et al. Paper I. 2017ApJ...850...74K Cat J/ApJ/850/74 Berney et al. Paper II. 2015MNRAS.454.3622B Oh et al. Paper III. 2017MNRAS.464.1466O Lamperti et al. Paper IV. 2017MNRAS.467..540L Ricci et al. Paper V. 2017ApJS..233...17R This catalog Trakhtenbrot et al. Paper VI. 2017MNRAS.470..800T
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 13-Feb-2018
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues.From this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line

catalogue service

© Unistra/CNRS

Contact