Search catalogue
J/ApJ/709/L114 Protoplanetary disks in PMS binaries (Duchene, 2010)
Planet formation in binary systems: a separation-dependent mechanism? Duchene G. <Astrophys. J., 709, L114-L118 (2010)> =2010ApJ...709L.114D
ADC_Keywords: Photometry, millimetric/submm ; Planets ; YSOs ; Stars, pre-main sequence ; Stars, double and multiple Keywords: binaries: general - planetary systems - planets and satellites: formation - protoplanetary disks Abstract: In this Letter, I examine several observational trends regarding protoplanetary disks, debris disks, and exoplanets in binary systems in an attempt to constrain the physical mechanisms of planet formation in such a context. Binaries wider than about 100AU are indistinguishable from single stars in all aspects. Binaries in the 5-100AU range, on the other hand, are associated with shorter lived but (at least in some cases) equally massive disks. Furthermore, they form planetesimals and mature planetary systems at a similar rate as wider binaries and single stars, albeit with the peculiarity that they predominantly produce high-mass planets. I posit that the location of a stellar companion influences the relative importance of the core accretion and disk fragmentation planet formation processes, with the latter mechanism being predominant in binaries tighter than 100AU. Description: In order to draw a broad and homogeneous view of the initial conditions for planet formation, I compiled a sample of 107 PMS binaries for which deep (sub)millimeter continuum observations and/or near- to mid-infrared colors are available in the literature (see Table 1). File Summary:
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 86 107 Sample of Taurus and Ophiuchus protoplanetary disks considered in this study
See also: J/ApJ/696/L84 : Primordial circumstellar disks in binary systems (Cieza+, 2009) J/ApJ/703/1964 : Spectra of three nearby star-forming regions (Furlan+, 2009) J/PASJ/60/209 : Faint companions around YSOs in TMC (Itoh+, 2008) J/ApJS/179/451 : Predicted IR excesses for protoplanetary disks (Kenyon+, 2008) J/ApJ/671/1800 : SCUBA observations of ρ Oph cloud (Andrews+, 2007) J/ApJ/647/1180 : Infrared photometry of Taurus SFR (Luhman+, 2006) J/ApJ/636/932 : Mid-infrared survey of T Tauri stars (McCabe+, 2006) J/A+A/372/173 : ISOCAM observations of the rho Ophiuchi cloud (Bontemps+, 2001) J/ApJS/101/117 : UBVRIJHKLMNQ photometry in Taurus-Auriga (Kenyon+ 1995) Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 13 A13 --- Region Region (Taurus-Auriga or Ophiucius) 15- 34 A20 --- Target Target name (Pre-Main-Sequence star) 36- 46 A11 --- AName Alternate target name 48- 53 F6.1 AU Sep Separation between the stars 55- 59 F5.2 mag Color ? Spitzer/IRAC 3.6-8.0 micron band color index 61 A1 --- f_Color [cdegh] reason of missing Color (1) 63 A1 --- d? [Y/N] Inner disk present? 65 A1 --- f_d? [f] Presence of inner disk from SED (2) 67 A1 --- l_F.85 Limit on F.85 68- 73 F6.1 mJy F.85 ? Flux density at 850 micron 75 A1 --- l_F1.3 Limit on F1.3 76- 80 F5.1 mJy F1.3 ? Flux density at 1.3mm 82- 86 A5 --- Ref Reference(s) (3)
Note (1): Flag as follows: c = In the absence of a 3.6 micron measurement, I used the [4.5]-[8.0] color and assumed that [3.6]-[8.0] ≥ [4.5]-[8.0]. d = In the absence of published Spitzer/IRAC photometry of the system, I used the K-N color. e = In the absence of published Spitzer/IRAC photometry of the system, I used the K-L color. g = In the absence of published Spitzer/IRAC photometry of the system, I used the L-N color and assumed that K-N ≥ L-N. h = In the absence of published Spitzer/IRAC photometry of the system, I used the α_2-14 micron_ spectral index. Note (2): f = In the absence of published infrared photometry beyond 3 micron, I relied on the "SED class" from Andrews & Williams (2005ApJ...631.1134A, 2007, Cat. J/ApJ/671/1800). For Taurus sources, this classification is based on the classification proposed by Kenyon & Hartmann (1995, Cat. J/ApJS/101/117). Note (3): References as follows: 1 = Luhman et al.(2006, Cat. J/ApJ/647/1180); 2 = Andrews & Williams (2005ApJ...631.1134A); 3 = Hartmann et al.(2005ApJ...629..881H); 4 = Cieza et al.(2009, Cat. J/ApJ/696/L84); 5 = McCabe et al.(2006, Cat. J/ApJ/636/932); 6 = Guilloteau et al.(1999A&A...348..570G); 7 = Kenyon & Hartmann (1995, Cat. J/ApJS/101/117); 8 = Duchene et al.(2010ApJ...712..112D); 9 = Jensen & Akeson (2003ApJ...584..875J); 10 = Jensen et al.(1996ApJ...458..312J); 11 = Andrews & Williams (2007, Cat. J/ApJ/671/1800); 12 = Bontemps et al. (2001, Cat. J/A+A/372/173).
History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Greg Schwarz [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 09-Mar-2012
| The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues.From this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line |
© UDS/CNRS