Access to Astronomical Catalogues

← Click to display the menu
J/A+A/546/A61       Radial velocities for XHIP catalogue    (de Bruijne+, 2012)

Radial velocities for the Hipparcos-Gaia Hundred-Thousand-Proper-Motion project. de Bruijne J.H.J., Eilers A.-C. <Astron. Astrophys. 546, A61 (2012)> =2012A&A...546A..61D
ADC_Keywords: Stars, nearby ; Radial velocities ; Proper motions Keywords: techniques: radial velocities - astronomical databases: miscellaneous - catalogs - astrometry - parallaxes - proper motions Abstract: The Hundred-Thousand-Proper-Motion (HTPM) project will determine the proper motions of ∼113500 stars using a ∼23-year baseline. The proper motions will be based on space-based measurements exclusively, with the Hipparcos data, with epoch 1991.25, as first epoch and with the first intermediate-release Gaia astrometry, with epoch ∼2014.5, as second epoch. The expected HTPM proper-motion standard errors are 30-190µas/yr, depending on stellar magnitude. Depending on the astrometric characteristics of an object, in particular its distance and velocity, its radial velocity can have a significant impact on the determination of its proper motion. The impact of this perspective acceleration is largest for fast-moving, nearby stars. Our goal is to determine, for each star in the Hipparcos catalogue, the radial-velocity standard error that is required to guarantee a negligible contribution of perspective acceleration to the HTPM proper-motion precision. Description: Table A.1 covers the 117955 entries of the XHIP catalogue (Anderson & Francis 2012AstL...38..331A, Cat. V/137). These are all Hipparcos-catalogue entries with astrometry. Columns 1-7 refer to data extracted from the XHIP catalogue described in Section 2. Columns 8-10 summarise some key quantities of our method. Columns 11-14 provide data from the N = 10000 Monte-Carlo simulations that we ran for each star (Section 4.4). Columns 15-18 refer to the Gaussian criterion developed in Section 5.1. Columns 19-22 refer to the robust criterion, which is described in Section 5.2. The 206 stars identified by us that require spectroscopic follow-up are those with sigma68Robust < 68.27%. File Summary:
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
ReadMe 80 . This file tablea1.dat 181 117955 Final-results
See also: I/239 : The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues (ESA 1997) I/311 : Hipparcos, the New Reduction (van Leeuwen, 2007) V/137 : Extended Hipparcos Compilation (XHIP) (Anderson+, 2012) Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea1.dat
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
1- 6 I6 --- HIP [1/120404] Hipparcos identifier 8- 15 F8.2 km/s RV ? Radial velocity from XHIP (V/137) (1) 17- 24 F8.2 km/s e_RV ? Error on RV (1) 26- 28 I3 --- q_RV [1/4]? Quality flag for RV, 1=best (1) (2) 30- 35 F6.2 mas plx Trigonometric parallax from XHIP 37- 42 F6.2 mas e_plx Trigonometric parallax error 44- 51 F8.4 mag Hpmag Hipparcos broad-band Hp magnitude 53- 60 F8.4 uas/yr/km/s C ? Proper-motion sensitivity to radial velocity (3) 62- 71 F10.2 km/s Sigma ? Σ for the "error-free" XHIP astrometry (3) 73- 75 I3 --- f_Sigma [1/2]? Coordinate flag for Sigma and C: 1=Right Ascension, 2=Declination (4) 77- 86 F10.2 km/s Sig.med ? Median {Sgima} value of the 10,000 Monte-Carlo simulations (3) 88- 97 F10.2 km/s Sig.min ? Smallest Σ value maong the 10,000 Monte-Carlo simulations (3) 99-108 F10.2 km/s mu.Sig ? Mean of the Gauss fit to the 10,000 Monte-Carlo simulations (3) 110-119 F10.2 km/s sig.Sig ? Standard deviation of the Gauss fit (3) 121-126 F6.2 % c(G) [0/100]? Gaussian confidence level (3) 128-134 F7.2 km/s sig68G ? Radial-velocity precision needed for c(G)=68.27% (3) (6) (5) 136-142 F7.2 km/s sig95G ? Radial-velocity precision needed for c(G)=95.45% (3) (6) (5) 144-150 F7.2 km/s sig99G ? Radial-velocity precision needed for c(G)=99.73% (3) (6) (5) 152-157 F6.2 % c(rob) [0/100]? Robust confidence level (3) 159-165 F7.2 km/s sig68rob ? Radial-velocity precision needed for c(rob)=68.27% (3) (6) 167-173 F7.2 km/s sig95rob ? Radial-velocity precision needed for c(rob)=95.45% (3) (6) 175-181 F7.2 km/s sig99rob ? Radial-velocity precision needed for c(rob)=99.73% (3) (6)
Note (1): For stars without literature radial velocity, these columns are blank (see Section 2.2). Note (2): Quality flag is: 1 = Most likely to be within stated error bounds (A) from XHIP 2 = May have small systematic errors (B) from XHIP 3 = May have larger systematic errors (C) from XHIP 4 = No error available or other serious problems (D) from XHIP Note (3): for the 11171 entries with insignificant parallax measurements in the XHIP catalogue, these columns are blank (see Section 4.4). Note (4): The flag indicates to which Coordinate Sigma and C refer: 1 = C and Sigma refer to right ascension 2 = C and Sigma refer to declination Note (5): if, for the given value of the confidence level c(G), the argument of the square root in Equation (20) is negative, these columns are blank (see Section 5.1) Note (6): if the radial-velocity precision (standard error) to reach a certain confidence level exceeds 9999.99 km/s, a value of 9999.99km/s is listed.
Acknowledgements: Jos de Bruijne, jdbruijn(at)rssd.esa.int
(End) Jos de Bruijne [ESA/ESTEC], Patricia Vannier [CDS] 16-Aug-2012
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues.From this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line

catalogue service

© UDS/CNRS

Contact