Ao@'U@rlp ТD z]`--:*"V|X˳o޼Rkop6t Z*_n6(m7?}{ELF*;mIM@G(#(يu!l4KO' 鬸)BDaq =dKН,Μ\ӬHe#m:.?1Hd6Zu&X(o8=c[8^G#G5n^wm043sY:a]7ppFn+ysjMfm۶"V׍2xWJ2?;X32נ_H`v,_Jf4fijnҍp?}7]>-,2A*"׽&ÀgG#Table: IX/9/pulsrnte.dat (http://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- No te Text ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.Ogelman, H.B., et al. Astrophys. J. 209, 584, (1976ApJ...209..584O). 2.Thompson, D.J, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 127, 220, (1983A&A...127..220T). 3.Also appears on list of Ogelman et al. (1976ApJ...209..584O), 3 updated parameters. 4.Distance uncertainty relatively large. 5.Based on 10 bin phase plot. 6.Upper limit based on search of periods around the nominal value. 7.Binary pulsar. 8.Uses parameters prior to the 1977 glitch (Manchester et al. 1978, Mon. 8 Not. R. Astron. Soc. 184, 35P. (1978MNRAS.184p..35M) 9.Crab pulsar, positive result. Thompson et al., Astrophys. J., 213, 252 9 (1977ApJ...213..252T). 10.Vela pulsar, positive result. Thompson et al., Astrophys. J., 214, L17 10 (1977ApJ...214L..17T). -----------------------------------------------------------------------------